What are the Different Types of Dielectrics?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the terminology and characteristics of different types of dielectrics in physics, specifically linear, homogeneous, isotropic, and their variations. A linear dielectric exhibits a linear relationship between the polarization vector and the electric field, while a homogeneous dielectric has a constant dielectric constant throughout its volume. An isotropic dielectric has the same dielectric constant in all directions, meaning off-diagonal elements in the susceptibility matrix are zero. The conversation explores the existence of various combinations of dielectrics, such as homogeneous nonisotropic linear dielectrics and nonhomogeneous isotropic linear dielectrics, questioning their practical existence. The discussion concludes with examples of anisotropic dielectrics and the implications of linearity and nonlinearity in different field strengths.
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hi

I have some comments/questions about the terminology used for dielectrics in physics textbooks. Linear dielectric means that components of \vec{P} are linear
combination of the components of \vec{E}.

Homogeneous dielectric means that dielectric constant is not the function of coordinates.

Isotropic dielectric means that at any given point inside the dielectric , the dielectric constant (and hence \chi ) is same in all directions, which ,means that all off diagonal elements in the matrix \chi are zero.

Physics textbooks most often talk about homogeneous isotropic linear dielectric. But some times they relax some conditions but don't specify the nature of the dielectric exactly. Lot of sloppy language there.

Now I am just trying to play with these 3 words and see what I get. for example , consider,
homogeneous nonisotropic linear dielectric. So here \chi is a tensor and
off diagonal elements are non zero. Further it is not function of coordinates.
Do such dielectrics exist ?

Next, consider nonhomogeneous isotropic linear dielectric. Here \chi is a scalar
which is a function of coordinates and we still have linearity. Again do such materials exist ?

Finally, nonhomogeneous nonisotropic nonlinear dielectrics. I know J.D.Jackson talks about
non linear dielectrics , but I am not sure if he talks about this particular case, which is
most general. Do such materials exist ?

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any mixture of different nonisotropic, nonlinear dielectrics would
by the definition of homogeneous (uniform in composition) be
a NONhomogeneous, nonisotropic, nonlinear dielectric. But it might be
thought misleading to call it a single dielectric.
 
IssacNewton said:
Hi


Isotropic dielectric means that at any given point inside the dielectric , the dielectric constant (and hence \chi ) is same in all directions, which ,means that all off diagonal elements in the matrix \chi are zero.
Even for anisotropic dielectric you can have the off-diagonal elements zero, if you choose the right axes. For the case of isotropic the diagonal elements are all the same so there is actually only one constant.
 
but do the kind of materials exist as I asked ?
 
First, linearity is an approximation that holds more or less, for fields weak enough.
So you may rather ask if the linear, isotropic, homogenous really exist or not.

Next, examples of anisotropic dielectrics are many single-crystal dielectrics with symmetry other than cubic. At low field they are linear. And homogenous, more or less.

Nonlinear is most everything at large fields.

Non-homogenous may be a composite material.
 
thanks nasu...makes sense
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top