Terminology: free algebra with binary op, constant.

Skolem
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
In the sense of 'universal algebra':

The natural numbers N can be presented as an free algebra with one constant (0) and one -unary- operation s(x) (i.e. x --> x+1). We have (of course) elements 0, s(0), s(s(0)), etc...

Is there a good name for a set A with one constant (*) and one -binary- operation b? Here one term is b(b(*,*),b(b(*,*),*)), which can be visualized as some sort of unlabeled binary tree.

Unfortunately, there are multiple concepts related to the term binary tree (see Wikipedia, for example). Here for example, every node must have 0 or 2 children, not 0, 1 or 2 as is commonly allowed. Plus there is the distinction between combinatorial objects and their algebraic forms.

Hopefully there is something more common than "Free (2,0)-algebra [over the empty set]".


Skolem
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, your characterization of N is precisely that (N, [0, s]) is the initial F-algebra, where F: Set -> Set is the functor defined by F(S) = 1 + S, where 1 is a one-element set (a terminal object in Set) and + is the disjoint union (coproduct in Set). Here [0, s] denotes the function 1 + N -> N uniquely determined by the coproduct from the functions 0: 1 -> N and s: N -> N. This definition captures the recursion properties of N: For any set S, x in S, and f: S -> S, we have that (S, [x, f]) is a F-algebra, so there is a unique function k = k[x, f]: N -> S (called a catamorphism) such that k(0) = x and k(s(n)) = f(k(n)) for all n in N. (You should draw a commutative diagram at this point.)

So in the case of the binary operation, let F be the functor Set -> Set defined by F(S) = 1 + (S × S); then (A, [*, b]) is the initial F-algebra. This means that for any set S with x in S and binary operation f: S × S -> S (so that (S, [x, f]) is a F-algebra), there is a unique function k = k[x, f]: A -> S (the catamorphism) satisfying k(*) = x and k(b(m, n)) = f(k(m), k(n)).
 
adriank said:
Well, your characterization of N is precisely that (N, [0, s]) is the initial F-algebra, where F: Set -> Set is the functor defined by F(S) = 1 + S, where 1 is a one-element set (a terminal object in Set) and + is the disjoint union (coproduct in Set). Here [0, s] denotes the function 1 + N -> N uniquely determined by the coproduct from the functions 0: 1 -> N and s: N -> N. This definition captures the recursion properties of N: For any set S, x in S, and f: S -> S, we have that (S, [x, f]) is a F-algebra, so there is a unique function k = k[x, f]: N -> S (called a catamorphism) such that k(0) = x and k(s(n)) = f(k(n)) for all n in N. (You should draw a commutative diagram at this point.)

So in the case of the binary operation, let F be the functor Set -> Set defined by F(S) = 1 + (S × S); then (A, [*, b]) is the initial F-algebra. This means that for any set S with x in S and binary operation f: S × S -> S (so that (S, [x, f]) is a F-algebra), there is a unique function k = k[x, f]: A -> S (the catamorphism) satisfying k(*) = x and k(b(m, n)) = f(k(m), k(n)).

Yes, but this still leaves my question open: the first 'F-algebra' is called the 'natural numbers', but what is the second 'F-algebra' called? Perhaps the second example has no colloquial name like the first.


Skolem
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top