Tertiary Arithmetics: Is it Possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Uke
  • Start date Start date
Uke
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Is there any arithmetic operation with three operands (or arguments), such that it cannot be calculated by a sequence of common binary and unary operations? This is not a homework problem or anything like that, I am just curious.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What precisely do you mean by 'arithmetic' here? Anyways, if you're simply talking about functions, then the answer is no, because you can encode a pair of numbers into a single number, and build your ternary function from the two binary functions:

1. Encode the first two numbers into a single number
2. Take the output of (1) and the third number, unpack (1) and compute the ternary function


An example of how to do the encoding would be to alternate taking digits from your two numbers. For example,

encode(12345, 678) = 1020364758

Incidentally, the word is 'ternary'
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top