Tesla Wardenclyffe experiment, researching

  • Thread starter Thread starter RBurnside99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Experiment Tesla
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the feasibility of the Tesla Wardenclyffe experiment and the potential to replicate it. Concerns are raised about the legitimacy of fundraising efforts associated with the project, especially when it promises extraordinary results. Participants express skepticism regarding the practicality of Tesla's original concepts, noting that modern physics contradicts his ideas about wireless energy transmission. There is also interest in exploring the historical significance of the Wardenclyffe tower and the possibility of constructing a smaller-scale version for experimental purposes. Ultimately, the conversation highlights a mix of intrigue and caution regarding Tesla's legacy and the project's viability.
RBurnside99
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Sorry, maybe not the best place for this but I need some guidance, so first, here's the link

[link deleted]

and here's the situation: For obvious reasons I'd be very interested in seeing this become a reality, but having no idea of the principles involved I couldn't even begin to understand whether they're on the up or not (though the 40k might be proof enough). This would all be a null point if it was just myself, as I would donate what I could and leave it at that, however, through my partner's family I may be able to involve some fairly influential/wealthy individuals, so, assuming this is legit, what I'm asking is this, how would one go about selling this project to an individual who was at one time in the top 500 wealthiest people in the UK?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry, but that link is soliciting money. It's deleted.

As a general principle, if someone a) promises something that seems too good to be true, b) involes the spirit of Nikola Tesla, and c) asks for money, you should hold on to your wallet.
 
But what about the actual Wardenclyffe tower and experiment? Could someone attempt to try and build a copy of the device just to see what it could've done? That is, disregarding the questionable website. I don't expect miracles, but might not it be an interesting thing to do? Even build a smaller-scale copy?
 
sshai45 said:
But what about the actual Wardenclyffe tower and experiment? Could someone attempt to try and build a copy of the device just to see what it could've done? That is, disregarding the questionable website. I don't expect miracles, but might not it be an interesting thing to do? Even build a smaller-scale copy?

Using the Earth and sky for conduction and the induction of large amounts of electrical energy for practical uses over large distances is just impossible the way Tesla imagined. Tesla had no idea of the true physics of electromagnetic energy (radio/EM waves) and called those who did clowns and meta-physicists.
http://earlyradiohistory.us/1919tru.htm
The Hertz wave theory of wireless transmission may be kept up for a while, but I do not hesitate to say that in a short time it will be recognized as one of the most remarkable and inexplicable aberrations of the scientific mind which has ever been recorded in history.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top