I Test for inconsistency of system of nonlinear equations

AI Thread Summary
A quick test for determining the inconsistency of a system of nonlinear equations is not straightforward, as the concept of inconsistency typically implies the absence of solutions. In the given example, both equations equal z cubed, indicating they are not dependent and can have multiple solutions, including the trivial solution of x=y=z=0. The discussion highlights that deriving an impossible equation, like x^2=-1 in real numbers, indicates inconsistency, but identifying such cases isn't always obvious. The nature of these equations relates to algebraic varieties, which are complex and often analyzed through commutative algebra and algebraic geometry. Ultimately, there is no simple test available to definitively determine the inconsistency of nonlinear systems.
e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
Is there a quick test to determine if a system of nonlinear equations is inconsistent. For example, suppose there is a system of equations such as:

3x cubed + 2y cubed = z cubed
2x cubed + 5y cubed = z cubed

Since these two equations are clearly not dependent, could we say that since they both are equal to the same term (z cubed), that they are therefore, inconsistent?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
x=y=z=0 is a solution, for example.

Both left hand sides are equal to the same thing, which means ##3x^2+2y^3=2x^3+5y^3##, that is an equation with solutions. An infinite set of solutions, actually. And for every solution of that equation there is a z that fits.

If you can derive something impossible, (like ##x^2=-1## if you work with real numbers), then there is no solution, but it is not always directly obvious if you can do that.
 
e2m2a said:
Is there a quick test to determine if a system of nonlinear equations is inconsistent. For example, suppose there is a system of equations such as:

3x cubed + 2y cubed = z cubed
2x cubed + 5y cubed = z cubed

Since these two equations are clearly not dependent, could we say that since they both are equal to the same term (z cubed), that they are therefore, inconsistent?
They are not "inconsistent" which presumable means "without solution". Those kind of questions define an algebraic variety and are subject to commutative algebra and algebraic geometry. As far as I know, there is no test in "P" that decides the shape of the zeros, but this is more of a guess.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top