Test Your Math Skills: 50/50 Guess Game

[grey22]

Decimal 5 = 50 percent.
50 percercent is written 50/50, fifty/fifty.

Are you closer to 50 percent or one ?

I say one. But I may be wrong. What do you think ?

What are the implications of your answer ?

 

[selfAdjoint]

Fifty-fifty does not mean the fraction 50/50. The value of that fraction is 1. Fifty-fifty means you take half (50%) and I'll take half. Even steven (which does not refer to Steven Hawking).

 

[grey22]

"50/50"

There is the symmetry of 1) Ratio, 2)Irrational.

If symmetry does exist in the irrational, the numerator is also the denominator.

I have to go. But think on that.

 

[grey22]

The idea is. Symmetry is 1.) Rational. 2.) Irrational.

Since this is true. 50/50, can be represented by this graphic.

O/O

This is either 1.) Rational. Or 2.) Irrational. Or 3.) Both Irrational + Rational.

If it is both Rational + Irrational. It can be both, or either.

I say, it is the rational number 1.

 

[HallsofIvy]

This is all a joke, right?

 

[grey22]

This is all a joke, right?

Nope.

 

[HallsofIvy]

I'm very sorry to hear that.

 

[grey22]

I'm very sorry to hear that.

The fact of the matter is the irrational number pi, can be symmetric through rational numbers.

1=1

Edit.

[Rational 50/50 = Irrational 50/50] = Real Numbers; 1

 

[Zurtex]

Sorry but you need to stop and realize you do not have any rigorous understanding of mathematics and you need to sit down and read a lot if you want.

The number system we use has been carefully constructed over a long period of time, we don't just take philosophical ideas randomly and turn them into mathematics with no real idea of what they mean.

 

[DeadWolfe]

I can't understand what you're saying.

Could you please try again, it's not very clear right now.

 

[grey22]

I'm trying not to influence mankind. But...I like to talk. So, I'll reiterate myself.

# 1.) Symmetry functions with 1.

edit
# 2.) The irrational number 1 pi / The irrational number 1 pi = 1 / 1

 

[jcsd]

I'm trying not to influence mankind...

But i get the feeling some very powerful drugs are trying to influence you

 

[Zurtex]

I'm trying not to influence mankind. But...I like to talk. So, I'll reiterate myself.

# 1.) Symmetry functions with 1.

# 2.) 1 pi / 1 pi = 1 / 1

Please explain what that means, I have no idea what the first means and I am going to guess in the second you are trying to write:

\frac{1*\pi}{1*\pi} = \frac{1}{1}

Which makes sense as:

\frac{1}{1} = 1 \quad \text{and} \quad 1*a=a

and:

\frac{a}{a} = 1 \quad \forall a \in \mathbb{R} \backslash \{ 0 \}

 

[grey22]

I'm showing a way to classify real numbers.

1 Pi / 1 Pi = 1 / 1

OR.

O / O = 1 / 1
Where O Is the description of Pi.

 

[DeadWolfe]

Are you a poli-sci major or something?

 

[danne89]

Strange... Are you aware of you cannot express Pi in the form \frac {a}{b}. That is called irrational. Or are you implifing something else?

 

[grey22]

If Pi cannot be symmetrically expressed within a fraction, how can pi(edit.The irrational number pi) exist within a fraction ?

And then, if pi can be expressed within a fraction, can't that fraction equal 1.

And NO. I am no polical Scientist.

 

[grey22]

If Pi cannot be symmetrically expressed within a fraction, how can pi(edit.The irrational number pi) exist within a fraction ?

And then, if pi can be expressed within a fraction, can't that fraction equal 1.

And NO. I am no polical Scientist.

Pi must (edit. Symmetrically)exist within a fraction, TO EQUAL PI.

That fraction can equal 1. The irrational number pi / The irrational number pi; 1 / 1.

 

[grey22]

I'm patiently waiting for somebody to prove me wrong. I don't care if I'm wrong. So, go on. Go and prove me wrong. :shy:

 

[VietDao29]

Sorry, but I don't understand this... Why 50% = 50/50? This is just terribly wrong, isn't it??
Viet Dao,

 

[Muzza]

Please define what it means for a number to "exist within a fraction".

 

[grey22]

Sorry, but I don't understand this... Why 50% = 50/50? This is just terribly wrong, isn't it??
Viet Dao,

I think 50% ~ 1.
And, 50/50 = 1

I said, initially.
"Decimal 5 = 50 percent.
50 percercent is written 50/50, fifty/fifty."

So, the ~ 1, is written as 1, or 50/50.

I then said.
"Are you closer to 50 percent or one ?"

If your closer to 50%, how can the irrational number pi, exist within a fraction ?
If your closer to 1, than to 50%, the irrational number pi, can exist within a fraction, or 1.

Or course 1 irrational number pi equals itself. Written within a fraction, where it equals 1. Or else 1/1 = 50%, > 1.

 

[danne89]

If you define "exist in" as: \frac {x * \pi}{y * \pi} Pi/Pi = 1. So the only thing that exist in the fraction is x/y...

But I agreed with you; this question is quite confusing.

 

[Zurtex]

x% is defined as x% = x/100

And as for Pi, well:

\pi = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} 4\sum_{r=0}^n \frac{(-1)^r}{2r + 1}

That's how you define Pi without defining it as a fraction (as it can't be defined as a fraction p/q where p and q are integers).

Edit[/color]: Made a mistake in my defintion of Pi, please note that the mistake is quoted in the post below.

 

[grey22]

\pi = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \sum_{r=0}^n \frac{(-1)^r}{2r + 1}

That's how you define Pi without defining it as a fraction

If you cannot define the irrational number pi within a fraction, how can it be defined within a fraction ?
Or.
(O) The irrational number pi / (O) The irrational number pi

And if it cannot exist within a fraction, it cannot equal itself

Exist within which fraction ? How about quantum mechanics uncertainty principle. The irrational number pi is a fraction that equals one.
The uncertainty principle is uncertain if the irrational number pi, is as I say it is. So it's not uncertain at all. 1 certainly equals 1. Digital quantum mechanics.

I'm sorry I can't be more eloquent. But, this is the state of things presently.
God does not roll dice.

 

[DeadWolfe]

See kids?

LSD isn't as cool as Hunter Thompson makes it seem.

 

[Zurtex]

If you cannot define the irrational number pi within a fraction, how can it be defined within a fraction ?
Or.
(O) The irrational number pi / (O) The irrational number pi

And if it cannot exist within a fraction, it cannot equal itself

Exist within which fraction ? How about quantum mechanics uncertainty principle. The irrational number pi is a fraction that equals one.
The uncertainty principle is uncertain if the irrational number pi, is as I say it is. So it's not uncertain at all. 1 certainly equals 1. Digital quantum mechanics.

I'm sorry I can't be more eloquent. But, this is the state of things presently.
God does not roll dice.

All numbers, x, that exist in the real set satisfy the property:

\frac{x}{1} = x

That says nothing about whether or not they are rational.

Quantum mechanics is an application of mathematics, its laws are models which attempt to explain how particles work, not numbers.

 

[grey22]

Look at this image.

The definition for "Squared", not "Cubed".
The Squared root for pi, in a definition where the irrational number pi may be = 1 or .5

 

[grey22]

Quantum mechanics is ...

I'm not deferentialing from quantum theory, mechanics, etc... I'm just using a refference to use the uncertainty principle.

That says nothing about whether or not they are rational.

So it may be the irrational number pi...

 

[DeadWolfe]

I think this topic should be deleted.

 

[grey22]

I think this topic should be deleted.

I think then. I don't NEED to explain Quantum theory, mechanics, whatever it's called.

The real question is. technology, will then not need it. No. It will never need it. But, God does not roll the dice.

I'll let the likes of this character DW, i quoted. To play doctor.

I really thought u folks would like to read my ideas though, but this character DW, is acting so bad.

 

[grey22]

I think this topic should be deleted.

Explain your detesting this thread. Why ?

 

[DeadWolfe]

Because you're posts don't even have the grammatical construct of an English sentance.

Either

a) You just learned English, in which case I apologize for ahving offended you

b) You tihnk this is funny, in which case I don't think anyone here agrees

or

c) You are not mentally rational, and are a danger to yourself and others.

 

[Hurkyl]

I agree, this thread isn't making sense. You should have reported it! (And I should have paid more attention to it)