Testing optimality via complementary slackness

  • Thread starter Thread starter zfolwick
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
zfolwick
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I can't for the life of me understand this topic. given a point x =(1,1,1,1,1,1,1) and a primal LP, does the point solve the primal? An internet search revealed no answer to my question, only criteria which involves knowing y. I am aware that \sumaijxj < b then yi = 0, so I at least know which elements of y are zero, but the rest of the steps elude me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zfolwick said:
I can't for the life of me understand this topic. given a point x =(1,1,1,1,1,1,1) and a primal LP, does the point solve the primal? An internet search revealed no answer to my question, only criteria which involves knowing y. I am aware that \sumaijxj < b then yi = 0, so I at least know which elements of y are zero, but the rest of the steps elude me.

you need to be more clear. Explain in more detail.
 
given a point x =(a1, a2, ... am), is this point optimal for a given LP?

Is there a good, step-by-step description of this somewhere? The only thing I can find is that, if I have a point x and a point y, then I can use the weak duality theorem to say that cx = by or some such nonsense.

what I'm really trying to understand is the pivoting process wherein I *get* y from a given point x.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top