Medical Testing Self-Awareness: How Do We Know?

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Testing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of determining self-awareness in others, particularly in distinguishing between humans and advanced computers. A key point raised is that until a life-like android is created, one can assume that beings exhibiting self-awareness are indeed human. The analogy of a box that provides answers highlights the difficulty in proving self-awareness, as responses could be generated by a sophisticated program. The conversation questions the value of pursuing self-aware computers if their awareness cannot be definitively proven. However, it suggests that if a self-aware computer could provide answers without external connections, it could convince observers of its self-awareness, potentially leading to recognition in the scientific community. The dialogue concludes with a philosophical reflection on the nature of impossibility, emphasizing that while some things may seem impossible, they may not be inherently so.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0
How do you know that other people are self-aware and not just very sophisticated computers? In other words, let's say you had a box with something inside that gave answers to your questions, how could you ever tell if the thing in the box was self-aware? If it's impossible then what's the point of talking about making computers that are self-aware if it's you can never prove that they are or are not?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
"How do you know that other people are self-aware and not just very sophisticated computers?"
Until the day I meet a life-like android (or read that someone invented a life-like android), I will assume that all beings who appear to be self-aware, ARE actually self-aware human beings.

"lets say you had a box with something inside that gave answers to your questions, how could you ever tell if the thing in the box was self-aware?"
This sounds like a good definition of a Forum.
I type-out a question.
I send it to the Physics Forum.
Later, my computer screen comes back with an answer.
Certainly the answer could be self-generated by a computer program.
If the answer was clear and on-point, I wouldn't care if it came from a human (or not).

"If it's impossible [to tell the difference] then what's the point of talking about making computers that are self-aware if you can never prove that they are or are not?"
If I had a computer that was self-aware, it would be a simple matter to prove that it existed:
Input a question, and it outputs an answer.
Prove to a bystander that there is no external connection to a modem.
This will convince most people that the computer, itself, has output the answer.
If some scientist was still skeptical, I might show him the schematic of my design, and explain how my computer works. Then he would methodically go through the computer, attempting to hunt-down the secret modem. At some point, he would be convinced. Soon thereafter, I will win the Nobel Prize, and this will help convince the rest of the world that I have (indeed) created a self-aware computer.

It is impossible for a human to live in a Vacuum.
There is a Vacuum between the Earth and moon.
Therefore, what's the point of a Space program.

There is impossible ... and then there is IMPOSSIBLE.
 
Last edited:
put it infront of a mirror for a while.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
I use ethanol for cleaning glassware and resin 3D prints. The glassware is sometimes used for food. If possible, I'd prefer to only keep one grade of ethanol on hand. I've made sugar mash, but that is hardly the least expensive feedstock for ethanol. I had given some thought to using wheat flour, and for this I would need a source for amylase enzyme (relevant data, but not the core question). I am now considering animal feed that I have access to for 20 cents per pound. This is a...
Back
Top