Testing Time Dilation: Atomic Clocks in Jet Aircraft Experiment Results

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around a 1971 experiment involving atomic clocks flown in jet aircraft to test time dilation predictions of relativity. For part a, the calculation of how long the westbound plane must fly to lose 1 second relative to a ground clock resulted in an unreasonably long time of 31,688 years, indicating a potential error in the method. In part b, the observed time discrepancy of 273 nanoseconds led to a calculated average speed of 1226.2 m/s, which seems implausible for sustained flight in 1971. Participants noted the need to consider Earth's rotation and the relative motion of the planes in their calculations. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities of applying relativistic physics to practical scenarios.
KyleS4562
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
In 1971 four portable atomic clocks were flown around the world in jet aircraft, two east bound and two westbound, to test the times dilation predictions of relativity. a) If the westbound plane flew at an average speed of 1500 km/h relative to the surface, how long would it have to fly for the clock on board to lose 1s relative to the reference clock on the ground? b) In the actual experiment the plane circumflew Earth once and the observed discrepancy of the clocks was 273ns. What was the plane's average speed?

For the first part, I convereted 1500km/h to 416.6m/s, then put it terms of c, or 1.389x10^-6c. I then took the standard equation t'/(sqrt(1-(1.389x10^-6c)^2)/c^2) = t.
I then made t-t'=1, solved for t'=-1+t and put that into the equation.
Solving, I got 1x10^12 s, or 31,688 years. Is this a reasonable answer?

I think my method would be wrong, because I followed similar steps to get b. After removing the t' prime from the equation as I did in part a, I set t = 40075160m/v, 40075160m being the circumference of the earth. My equation was as follows:
(1/(sqrt(1-(v^2/c^2)))*(-273x10^-9s + 40075160/v) = 40075160/v

I solved for v, but got 1226.2 m/s, which is a speed I don't believe we've even held for a sustained flight now, let alone in 1971. Where am I going wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
for part a, it seems reasonable. It would take quite a long time to get a 1s discrepancy.

For part b, are you taking into account that the Earth rotates (and that the planes fly in opposite directions)?
 
No i did not. I will try that. But would I have to consider the Earth's rotation in part a as well?
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top