Textbook 'The Physics of Waves': Lifetime of SHM Oscillators

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of "lifetime" in oscillators, particularly focusing on underdamped, overdamped, and critically damped systems. It clarifies that while the lifetime of underdamped oscillators is defined as the time for amplitude to reduce by half, similar definitions can apply to overdamped and critically damped oscillators, although they typically do not exhibit oscillations. The term "lifetime" can be vague, with various definitions such as the time for amplitude reduction by factors of 1/e or 1/sqrt(e). The equations for overdamped and critically damped oscillators differ from underdamped ones, but the underlying principle of amplitude decay remains consistent across all types. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for accurately describing the behavior of different oscillator types.
brettng
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The lifetime of the state in free oscillation is of order ##\frac 1 { \Gamma }##.
Relevant Equations
$$\tau=\frac { \ln(4) } { \Gamma }$$
Reference textbook “The Physics of Waves” in MIT website:
https://ocw.mit.edu/courses/8-03sc-...es-fall-2016/resources/mit8_03scf16_textbook/

Chapter 2 - Section 2.3.2 [Page 47] (see attached file)


Question: In the content, it states that the lifetime of the state in free oscillation is of order ##\frac 1 { \Gamma }##. To my understanding, it means particularly the half-life of underdamped oscillators with position ##x\left( t \right)##:
$$x\left( t \right)=Ae^{ -\frac {\Gamma t} {2} }\cos(\omega t-\theta)$$

However, could I consider the "half-life" of overdamped oscillators and critically damped oscillators?

If so, would it still be of order ##\frac 1 { \Gamma }##?

1.JPG
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
brettng said:
In the content, it states that the lifetime of the state in free oscillation is of order ##\frac 1 { \Gamma }##.
Do you understand what is meant here by "lifetime"? Also, what do the equations for ##x(t)## look like over damped and critically damped oscillators?
 
DrClaude said:
Do you understand what is meant here by "lifetime"? Also, what do the equations for ##x(t)## look like over damped and critically damped oscillators?
I understand that lifetime means that the oscillation amplitude reduces by a factor of 2.

So, why can’t we still consider the “lifetime” of overdamped and critically damped oscillators by using the same definition?
 
In practice, people only refer to "oscillations" wrt underdamped systems. Otherwise we tend to use "rise time"; usually defined as 10-90%, tr = 2.2τ. But it is the equation that holds the real answers, the rest is just jargon.
 
  • Like
Likes brettng and DrClaude
brettng said:
I understand that lifetime means that the oscillation amplitude reduces by a factor of 2.
That would be the half-life. Lifetime itself is actually more vague. For instance, in this case one could take ##\tau = 1/\Gamma##, which would be the time for the oscillation amplitude to be reduced by a factor ##1/\sqrt{e}##, or ##\tau = 2/\Gamma##, for a reduction of the amplitude by ##1/e##. They are all of order ##1/\Gamma##, as the text states, and as @DaveE stated, they all relate to a decrease of the amplitude of oscillations, and different terminology is used for critically and over-damped oscillators, which do not actually oscillate.
 
  • Like
Likes brettng and DaveE
Thank you so much for your help!!!!!!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top