Thanks for the Help, Got It Sorted!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jack Jiang
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Thanks
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on optimizing the dimensions of a right circular cylinder oil can with a volume of 54π cubic inches to minimize material use. The minimum radius determined is 3 inches. The volume formula V = πr²h is used to express height in terms of radius, while the surface area A = 2πrh + 2πr² is derived for optimization. Participants confirm that the first derivative method is appropriate for finding the minimum surface area. The conversation concludes with agreement on the calculated dimensions.
Jack Jiang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Got It, Thanks Guys
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Jack Jiang said:
An oil can is to be made in the form of a right circular cylinder to contain 54pi cubic inches. what dimensions of the can will require the least amt. of material.did anyone get the radius to equal 3?

Right on, the min is 3.
V=(Pi)R^2=54(Pi)
A=2(Pi)RH+2(Pi)R^2
Solve for H in volume, find minimum through first derivative.
 
Last edited:
V = \pi r^{2}h

Thus

A = 2\pi rh + 2\pi r^{2}
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top