The angle that a vector makes when it is parallel to x-axis.

AI Thread Summary
A vector parallel to the x-axis has an angle of 0 radians if it points towards the positive x-axis and π radians if it points towards the negative x-axis. The angle does not depend on whether the vector is above or below the x-axis but rather on its direction. Both π and -π radians correspond to the same point on the unit circle, with the distinction being the direction of rotation—counterclockwise for π and clockwise for -π. The discussion emphasizes that while the angles are mathematically different, they lead to the same terminal position. Understanding these angles is crucial for accurately representing vector directions in physics and mathematics.
Alshia
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
If there is a (displacement) vector parallel to the x-axis, and this vector is below the x-axis, is the angle (in radians) made by this vector ∏ or -∏? Why?

If the vector is above the x-axis, what is the angle? Why?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Alshia said:
If there is a (displacement) vector parallel to the x-axis, and this vector is below the x-axis, is the angle (in radians) made by this vector ∏ or -∏? Why?

If the vector is above the x-axis, what is the angle? Why?

The angle does not depend on which side of the x-axis it lies on. It depends on what the direction of the vector is. Say if it were pointing towards positive x axis, then the angle would be 0. If pointing towards negative x-axis then angle would be ∏.

PS : ∏ and -∏ are the same thing :wink:
 
Infinitum said:
PS : ∏ and -∏ are the same thing :wink:
The reference points on the unit circle for the two angles are the same, but the angles are different. An angle of ##\pi## implies counterclockwise rotation; an angle of -##\pi## implies clockwise rotation.
 
Ah, I missed that accidentally. Thanks for the responses.
 
Mark44 said:
The reference points on the unit circle for the two angles are the same, but the angles are different. An angle of ##\pi## implies counterclockwise rotation; an angle of -##\pi## implies clockwise rotation.

Oh, yes. I was only speaking of them in the sense that they would put you in the same direction after rotation. :smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top