Evo said:
Are pleats back in? I remember watching "what not to wear" and they were making fun of the woman because she was still wearing those gastly pleated women's pants from the 80's. They said pleats were out and not to wear them. This was a couple of years ago.
Ok, I checked fall fashion 2008, pleats are coming back into style. OH NO. I do not look good in pleated pants. I have no waist line and no hips, no rear end, and skinny legs. I will look like I'm wearing clown pants again. I might as well add a little tutu.

Some people can carry them off, I can't.
I can't decide between these two lovely dresses from the new fall fashion line. The first one costs $436, the 2nd $429.

The purse is only $2,000.
Okay, there's a difference between pleats and ghastly 1980s old-lady pleats!

The pleated skirts that my old great aunt used to wear would never look good on anyone, and never did. Pleats on more modern, stylish skirts are more like little tucks than full pleats. Though, sure, there is no one style that works on every body type, so you might still want to avoid them. I just don't get why some people in this thread (and I don't mean you here) seem to think that just because a style looks bad on them that it's a bad style in general. It just means it's a bad style for them and their body type.
The style of those dresses doesn't bother me in terms of pleats/darts or overall shape (they might actually look good on me), but the colors/patterns are hideous!
Pleats in men's pants have never gone out of style. Though, I agree with Cyrus that they are better in pants you'll wear with a belt for a dressier look...then again, I don't think men look all that good without belts. Some can carry off that look, but most need that extra belt to keep their pants from falling off since they shouldn't have hips like women do.
As for the "baggy" shirt, it just looks like it's not tucked in all the way. Is it too long? It's kind of hard to tell since it seems like the pants are too big and the shirt is coming untucked quickly. It also looks like the sleeves are way to wide too though, so the rest of the shirt doesn't start to hang in the right place. It really doesn't make sense, unless you have very wide shoulders and are buying extra-large shirts or something. Afterall, if someone is putting on a lot of weight in the middle, they're also going to be putting it on in the chest and shoulders and everywhere else, so would just need to buy a bigger size, not have a smaller size cut wider around the middle. But, what brand was that? If I ever need maternity clothing, I'll remember who has the shirts that are narrow in the shoulders and wide in the middle.
Though, I went out shopping today and am finding a frustrating new problem...when did clothing manufacturers decide that women's arms have all grown two inches longer?! Almost every shirt or sweater I tried on had sleeves that were WAY too long. What sort of ape-like arms are these made for? I found only two sweaters that had proper length arms and that weren't shapeless sacks of yarn (I expected to sift through shapeless sacks of yarn...that's always been a problem with winter sweaters).
I'm not really even sure if it's so much that any of the clothing is being cut for fatter or slimmer people, but more that it's just cheap imported crap from sweatshops with no quality control, so nobody is checking that the proportions of the clothing make any sense for anyone.