The average potential inside an electrically neutral solid

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the average potential inside an electrically neutral solid placed in vacuum within a grounded hollow sphere. Participants explore the implications for electron wave propagation and phase shifts, particularly in relation to electron optical Zernike phase plates. The scope includes theoretical considerations and conceptual clarifications regarding electric potentials in materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the average potential inside the solid and whether an electron wave would experience a phase shift.
  • Another participant seeks clarification on whether the solid is charged or a conductor, indicating a need for more context.
  • A participant specifies that the solid is not charged and uses amorphous carbon as an example, linking the inquiry to the functioning of an electron optical Zernike phase plate.
  • Discussion includes the idea that materials develop surface potentials resembling dipole layers, which could affect electron phase shifts.
  • One participant suggests that the mean inner potential of carbon is about 10 V compared to vacuum, influencing phase shifts of electron waves, while expressing confusion about the implications of averaging charge density.
  • Another participant agrees with the reasoning presented but acknowledges a lack of specific knowledge about the system, inviting further input from others.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of charge distribution and potential averaging, with some agreement on the role of surface charges in influencing electron phase shifts. However, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact nature of the average potential and its effects.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of defining "average" and "inside" in the context of electric potentials, and the discussion touches on the limitations of applying the Poisson equation to the scenario without resolving the assumptions involved.

Philip Koeck
Gold Member
Messages
801
Reaction score
229
If a solid (a few nm diameter) was placed in vacuum inside a grounded hollow sphere, but without touching the sphere (zero gravity), qualitatively what would the potential inside this solid be on average? In other words I don't want to look so closely that I see the potential wells of the nuclei. Would an electron wave propagating through this solid experience a phase shift?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Philip Koeck said:
If a solid (a few nm diameter) was placed in vacuum inside a grounded hollow sphere, but without touching the sphere (zero gravity), qualitatively what would the potential inside this solid be on average? In other words I don't want to look so closely that I see the potential wells of the nuclei. Would an electron wave propagating through this solid experience a phase shift?
Is the solid charged? A conductor? Can you be a little more transparent as to where you are going here? Need more to go on.
 
The solid is not charged. As an example one could think of a piece of amorphous carbon.
The reason for my question is that I'm wondering about the usual explanation how an electron optical Zernike phase plate works. I can't quite make sense of it.
 
Philip Koeck said:
The solid is not charged. As an example one could think of a piece of amorphous carbon.
The reason for my question is that I'm wondering about the usual explanation how an electron optical Zernike phase plate works. I can't quite make sense of it.
Philip Koeck said:
what would the potential inside this solid be on average

What do you mean by "average" and "inside" ? Even inside a Faraday cage if I look at a simple electric dipole the near potential will vary but average to zero far away.
Materials develop surface potentials that look like ~dipole layers for various reasons. If a material looks like a negative slab of stuff with thin positive surface (or vice-versa) it will phase shift the electron passing through. It can even produce resonances if the geometry matches. Does that help?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip Koeck
hutchphd said:
Materials develop surface potentials that look like ~dipole layers for various reasons. If a material looks like a negative slab of stuff with thin positive surface (or vice-versa) it will phase shift the electron passing through. It can even produce resonances if the geometry matches. Does that help?
Yes, I think that might be the explanation. The idea is that carbon has a "mean inner potential" of about 10 V compared to vacuum, so that a 200 keV electron wave going through 20 nm of carbon is phase shifted by pi/2 compared to one going through vacuum. That's how a phase plate for an electron microscope is supposed to work. If I think of a solid as a smeared out negative charge with positive charges distributed evenly in it I can't get that to work. The average charge density (averaged over sufficiently large volumes) would be about zero everywhere and I would expect a mean inner potential equal to that of vacuum (based on the Poisson equation). If instead I assume a negative surface charge balanced by a positive charge right below it one could get a positive inner potential (compared to vacuum).
Do you agree with my reasoning or am I way off?
 
Yes that's what I think is happening. Be aware that I don't specifically know about this system, so if anyone knows that this is not the reason, please speak up !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Philip Koeck

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
17K