The behaviour of a vacuum without the influence of air pressure?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores an experiment involving two flasks, one containing a vacuum and the other filled with mercury, both placed within a larger vacuum flask. The central question is whether mercury would flow from the full flask to the vacuum flask when a valve is opened. It is theorized that mercury vapors would equalize pressure between the two flasks rather than liquid mercury flowing into the vacuum. The idea of "nature abhors a vacuum" is challenged, suggesting that equilibrium is reached through vapor pressure rather than liquid movement. Ultimately, the consensus leans towards no liquid flow occurring, as the pressure dynamics favor vapor equilibrium.
juniorcarty
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am curious to know if anyone knows if the following experiment has ever been conducted? If not, can anyone theorise what the result may be? 2 flasks A,B are of equal size. Flask A contains a vacuum. Flask B is entirely full of mercury, with no air present. To ensure that the effect of external air pressure has no influence on the experiment,both flasks A and B are contained within a third larger flask C, which itself contains a vacuum.(Apart from the presence of the flasks within obviously). A valve is opened between flasks A and B. Does the mercury in B flow into A? If so, it can be assumed that the consequential vacuum(ous) space so created in flask B, will necessarily always be 'harder' than that contained in flask A, therefore preventing the possibility that the mercury levels in both flasks will equalise. Alternatively, does the mercury simply remain in flask B? If so, this contradicts the statement that 'nature abhors a vacuum, does it not?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

I think you can understand the situation better if you do not think of the vacuum as a thing. When flask A is open, mercury vapours will start floating around and some will end up in flask B. Equilibrium should be reached when the vapour pressure of mercury is the same in both flasks. But I don't see why there would be any flow of liquid mercury.
 
Assuming that the flasks are level with each other then there is a tiny pressure differential. The pressure of the mercury vapor at the bottom of the empty flask is slightly higher than it is at the top of the full flask. This is due to gravity.

If the vapor at the top of the full flask is in equilibrium with the liquid at the top of the full flask and if the vapor at the bottom of the empty flask is at a higher pressure than that then one would expect condensation at the bottom of the empty flask.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top