The believing to never die - and how it may influence science

  • Thread starter Thread starter Omega0
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Science
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interplay between belief in immortality and its influence on scientific thought. Participants argue that the desire to avoid death leads to various fictional narratives, including religious beliefs and scientific theories like the concept of black holes and multiverses. The conversation highlights the tension between science and belief systems, suggesting that personal experiences and perceptions can shape scientific understanding. Ultimately, the consensus is that science is not entirely independent of belief, as misconceptions can arise from deeply held convictions about existence and the afterlife.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic scientific concepts, particularly in physics.
  • Familiarity with theories of black holes and multiverses.
  • Knowledge of the philosophical implications of science versus religion.
  • Awareness of psychological factors influencing beliefs about mortality.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the scientific principles behind black holes and their implications in modern physics.
  • Explore the Many Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics and its relation to multiverse theories.
  • Investigate the psychological aspects of belief in immortality and its impact on human behavior.
  • Examine historical conflicts between scientific discoveries and religious beliefs.
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, physicists, psychologists, and anyone interested in the relationship between belief systems and scientific inquiry.

Omega0
Messages
215
Reaction score
52
Hi,

I think that history shows a constant:

- nobody wants to die
- this introduces several versions of fiction (like religion)
- science is influenced by this fiction

Probably you can imagine several examples where the idea of immortality influenced or influences science? What do you think?

Just one example: Believing to get trough a Black Hole and appear in another universe in a "White Hole" or similar trash.

Please let me know!

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Omega0 said:
I think that history shows a constant:

- nobody wants to die
- this introduces several versions of fiction (like religion)
- science is influenced by this fiction
I don't need history to know nobody wants to die, but history tells me science and religion tend to be at odds.
 
Omega0 said:
nobody wants to die
If that's the case, why is there such a thing as suicide and assisted suicide?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillTre
russ_watters said:
I don't need history to know nobody wants to die, but history tells me science and religion tend to be at odds.
My point is more that science just carefully goes over to break some rules, if at all. It is mostly not to be at odds.

As an examply, you might have stared to the stars as a child, "ohh, is this infinite? Is there a dublicate of mine?". Nowadays it is partly popular to believe in multi universes and so on. For this "Many World" idea I have a pretty simple explanation: Even if someone goes, somewhere else the person will still exist. Nobody goes. "My sister is waiting there for me" or whatever.

I believe that there is sort of believing behind physics - even today.

In the scientifically worst case we will go into a wrong direction because we believe that we have to believe in the right way, and we stumble around in fog.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
phinds said:
If that's the case, why is there such a thing as suicide and assisted suicide?
Oh, that is pretty simple. Unfortunately I know such cases. If the pain is that big that you don't care if there is something later, a life or whatever after your death, you just want get away then you will do that.

I would recommend to speak about things where you have some experience with.
 
Your examples seem to be popular misperceptions of science rather than science Itself.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
caz said:
Your examples seem to be popular misperceptions of science rather than science Itself
Depends on the definition. "Science itself" (and I am not a Philosopher) is independent from any religion. As soon as you believe that things can't die or disappear or change you may have a problem - as a scientist.

Again, as an example: I believe that you can send a spaceship into a black hole and what you will get is not a smiling crew in another universe but ... nothing.

This is just an example but I would find it sort of boring to list way more for myself. If you don't find some, okay, I may list some more.

I just wanted to get your (the forums) impression how much you believe that only science rules science. I am absolutely convinced that this is not the case.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: weirdoguy
This thread is done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Astronuc, Wrichik Basu and phinds

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
8K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
6K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K