The Chinese Remainder Theorem for moduli that aren't relatively prime

audiowize
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hello,
I am looking into proving that the Chinese Remainder Theorem will work for two pairs of congruences IFF a congruent to b modulo(gcd(n,m)) for

x congruent to a mod(n) and x congruent to b mod(m).

I have gotten one direction, that given a solution to the congruences mod(m*n), then a congruent to b mod(gcd(m,n)).

My issue is going the other way, given a congruent to b mod(gcd(m,n)), show a solution to the congruences exists mod(m*n).

Can anybody help me with a start? I tried expressing the relationship between a and b and using that to determine what x would have to be, but I'm not convinced of the results.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
OK, I got that the gcd(n,m)|(a-b)-> x==a mod(n) and x==b mod(m) will have a solution, but showing that that solution is restricted to the modulus of m*n is giving me troubles...
 
AFAIK, the solution (if it exists) is unique modulo lcm(m,n), not modulo m*n.
 
The world of 2\times 2 complex matrices is very colorful. They form a Banach-algebra, they act on spinors, they contain the quaternions, SU(2), su(2), SL(2,\mathbb C), sl(2,\mathbb C). Furthermore, with the determinant as Euclidean or pseudo-Euclidean norm, isu(2) is a 3-dimensional Euclidean space, \mathbb RI\oplus isu(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (1,3), i\mathbb RI\oplus su(2) is a Minkowski space with signature (3,1), SU(2) is the double cover of SO(3), sl(2,\mathbb C) is the...
Back
Top