B How Precise Can QED Predict the Motion of Charged Particles?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter goran d
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    precision qed
goran d
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
It is claimed that QED could predict certain quantities, like the lamb shift and magnetic moment of electron with astonishing precision of 12 digits. My question is the following: does QED predict only a few things to this precision, or does it predict, this precisely, the entire arbitrary motion of charged particles in electromagnetic fields, in all situations? To what does such precision apply?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you call "the entire arbitrary motion of charged particles in electromagnetic fields, in all situations" is really limited in Quantum Electrodynamics. It's either that one deals with so-called "bound problems" or "scattering problems". Due to the slow divergence of the perturbative expansion of the S-matrix elements, one can get very good numerical predictions. But only under this limited spectrum of "motions".
 
dextercioby said:
What you call "the entire arbitrary motion of charged particles in electromagnetic fields, in all situations" is really limited in Quantum Electrodynamics. It's either that one deals with so-called "bound problems" or "scattering problems". Due to the slow divergence of the perturbative expansion of the S-matrix elements, one can get very good numerical predictions. But only under this limited spectrum of "motions".

Are there other types of motions to which QED does not apply?
 
goran d said:
the entire arbitrary motion of charged particles in electromagnetic fields

To get 12 digit accuracy of the motion, you need 12 digit accuracy of the field. This is not possible with today's technology.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Thread 'Lesser Green's function'
The lesser Green's function is defined as: $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\langle C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\rangle=i\bra{n}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(t')C_{\nu}(t)\ket{n}$$ where ##\ket{n}## is the many particle ground state. $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{n}e^{iHt'}C_{\nu}^{\dagger}(0)e^{-iHt'}e^{iHt}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ First consider the case t <t' Define, $$\ket{\alpha}=e^{-iH(t'-t)}C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt}\ket{n}$$ $$\ket{\beta}=C_{\nu}(0)e^{-iHt'}\ket{n}$$ $$G^{<}(t,t')=i\bra{\beta}\ket{\alpha}$$ ##\ket{\alpha}##...
Back
Top