Understanding the Clausius Clapeyron Relation: Explained Simply

Cassiano
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Not sure if this was the right place for this but here goes.
Hello all, so I'm trying to get an intuitive grasp of the Clausius Clapeyron relation dP/dT= L/TdelV. Where L is the latent heat of the phase transition. What I've got so far is this; the relation tells you how much extra pressure must be exerted on a system in order to change its phase for every degree it is away from the temperature it changes phase at 1 atm. Is this correct?

Also the Tempertaure used in the equation would be the temperature of the phase change at standard conditions right? Thank you for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Cassiano, welcome to PF!

Cassiano said:
Hello all, so I'm trying to get an intuitive grasp of the Clausius Clapeyron relation dP/dT= L/TdelV. Where L is the latent heat of the phase transition. What I've got so far is this; the relation tells you how much extra pressure must be exerted on a system in order to change its phase for every degree it is away from the temperature it changes phase at 1 atm. Is this correct?

Also the Tempertaure used in the equation would be the temperature of the phase change at standard conditions right?
Not exactly. It is the slope of the boundary between two phases in a PT-diagram. It is not related to any "standard" condition, be it 1 atm or something else. The temperature is simply the temperature at which you are considering the slope. Note also that it is ##dP/dT##, not ##\Delta P / \Delta T##, which is kind of implied by the way you formulated it. In other words, the relationship is not linear between the pressure and the temperature at which the transition takes place.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top