The concept of a force lifting a weight and the work done

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of work done when applying a force to lift a weight, specifically examining the interactions between applied forces and gravitational forces. Participants explore the definitions and implications of work in various contexts, including friction and energy dissipation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the work done can be calculated as ##W_{me}=(F_{me}-F_{g})\times 3##, questioning if this is correct.
  • Another participant argues that the work done by a force does not depend on other acting forces, suggesting that the total force applied is sufficient for calculating work.
  • Some participants express confusion about the concept of who does work to whom, emphasizing the importance of following conventions in energy transfer.
  • A participant suggests that friction does negative work, while others discuss the implications of defining work in terms of energy dissipation.
  • There is a discussion about the relationship between work done and energy dissipated, with concerns about potential misunderstandings regarding conservation of energy.
  • Participants debate the clarity of terminology, particularly regarding "useful work" versus energy that is dissipated as heat.
  • One participant highlights the importance of focusing on one object at a time to avoid confusion in analyzing forces and work done.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views on the definitions and implications of work, particularly in the context of friction and energy dissipation. The discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the best way to define and calculate work in the scenarios presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in their definitions and calculations, particularly regarding the assumptions made about forces acting on different objects and the implications for energy conservation. The discussion highlights the complexity of work and energy interactions in various physical scenarios.

  • #31
Mister T said:
Note that if one insists that the friction force does work,
You just apply the definition of work to both bodies (A, B) and the two equal but opposite friction forces acting on them.

Mister T said:
it is not possible to explain where the energy is going.
For kinetic friction the work done by A on B is of different magnitude than the work done by B on A. That difference represents the energy dissipated as heat.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
7K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
988
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K