The Constant Speed of Light: Investigating its Properties

AI Thread Summary
The speed of light in a vacuum is constant at 299,792,458 meters per second, regardless of the motion of the observer or the source of illumination, as stated in Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity. While light travels slower in optically dense mediums like water or air, its speed remains unchanged when propagating through a vacuum. Unlike sound, which is affected by the medium through which it travels, light's propagation is independent of the medium's motion. Observers moving relative to each other will measure the same speed of light, reinforcing its consistent nature. This fundamental property of light distinguishes it from other forms of wave propagation, such as sound.
Avgiu
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
The speed of light is not always the same but the speed of light does not alter regardless of the speed of the source of the illumination?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
wat?

speed of light is always the same i think

you are really taking advantage of your new membership
 
The speed of light in a vacuum is constant. When light passes through a more optically dense medium such as water or air, it travels slower.

If you are traveling through a vacuum towards a light source such as a star, you will measure the speed of this light to be 299,792,458 metres per second (this is the speed of light in a vacuum). You would also measure this same speed of light if you were stationary relative the the star or if you were moving away from it. This is the second postulate of Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity: the speed of light in a vacuum is independent of the motion of all observers, and will therefore always have the same value.
 
Zero-G said:
When light passes through a more optically dense medium such as water or air, it travels slower.
Clarification: light traveling through a medium appears to travel slower.
 
Avgiu said:
The speed of light is not always the same but the speed of light does not alter regardless of the speed of the source of the illumination?

visible light and other E&M radiation is the result of a changing E field cause a B field which is changing causing a changing E field which causes a changing B field, ...

now (please allow me to anthropomorphize), once these changing E and B fields are detached from the source of illumination and are then propagating in a vacuum free of the source, how are these changing fields going to know or care what the speed of the source is?

for sound, in which air (or water for underwater acoustics) is a medium that the sound waves travel in, when the medium moves it affects the propagation of the sound. sound propagating downwind measures faster to sound propagating upwind.

but, unlike sound, light propagates in a vacuum. and we can't tell the difference between a "moving" vacuum and a "stationary" vacuum. such a difference is meaningless and if that is the case, then the speed of the very same beam of light has to be the same for two observers moving relative to each other. for sound, the observer moving relative to the medium (air, in this case) will measure the speed of the same burst of sound waves as different than an observer that is moving along with the medium.
 
Last edited:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
878
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
30
Views
7K
Back
Top