The Contestant's Gamble: What is the Most Probable Outcome?

  • Thread starter Thread starter robert Ihnot
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The contestant faces a gamble with six unopened suitcases, two containing large disadvantageous numbers and four containing small advantageous numbers. Despite believing the odds favor him, calculations reveal a 40% chance for a favorable outcome, a 53% chance for an unfavorable one, and a 7% chance for a very negative result. Ultimately, the contestant's decision to open two suitcases resulted in a loss, dropping his total from $109,000 to $66,000, aligning with the majority outcome of 53%. It is suggested that contestants should consider quitting when reaching $100,000, as the risk of selecting a large number increases with each choice. The discussion concludes that the most probable outcome when opening three cases would still lean towards hitting two small and one big number, reinforcing the inherent risks in the game.
robert Ihnot
Messages
1,058
Reaction score
1
The contestant has 6 suitcases unopened. Two of them are disadvantages and contain large numbers--which would count against him. The remaining 4 contain small numbers to his advantage.

The contestant may quit, or if he chooses to go on, he must choose to open two suitcases. (It is disadvantages to pick even 1 large number out of his two choices.)

The contestant sees that four of the cases are to his advantage and only two against him, and so he decides to play on and open two cases. He remarks to the audience, "The numbers favor me!"

But do they? What is the most probable outcome?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
4*3 ways to choose both small; 4 * 2 * 2 ways to choose one small and one big; 2 * 1 ways to choose both big. Overall, it's a 40% chance for 'good stuff', 53% chance for 'bad stuff', and a 7% chance for 'very bad stuff'.
 
In other words, yeah, the odds probably don't favor his playing.
 
csprof2000 In other words, yeah, the odds probably don't favor his playing.

IT CERTAINLY WORKED THAT WAY! He came on with about $109,000, hit one small and one big, and the next thing I remember he left the stage with only $66,000. In other words his outcome was in the majority case, that is, the CRGreenhouse case of 53%.

I have noticed that, mostly, if the contestant can reach $100,000 he is well advised to quit, at least in my book, and those unfortunate big cases have a way of happening that might not be expected, at least if we go individually case by case.

If we went further with this and supposed he did three cases, we would have (4/6)(3/5)(2/4) = 24/120 = 20% probability of winning all three. Yet the contestant, we know, had a individual chance of 50% to 67% in all three cases.

The most likely outcome in three cases would be to hit two small and one big = 60%. The other case of two big and one small would be the remaining 20%.
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top