1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The definition of a field supposes simultaneity?

  1. Sep 24, 2015 #1
    A field is defined as a distribution throughout all space (or at least a portion of it). But all of (a portion of) space means all of space at a particular moment, no? But that sounds as if it assumes simultaneity. But I thought simultaneity was a meaningless concept, according to relativity. What am I missing here?
  2. jcsd
  3. Sep 24, 2015 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If a field is static then simultaneity is irrelevant. If a field is changing then one may need to describe it as a field over four dimensional space-time rather than just three-dimensional space.

    Simultaneity is not meaningless in special relativity. It is just that it is frame-relative rather than a universal invariant.
  4. Sep 24, 2015 #3


    Staff: Mentor

    In field theory the fields are fields on spacetime, not just space.
  5. Sep 24, 2015 #4
    Thank you, jbriggs444 and DaleSpam. Your responses were very helpful.
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Similar Discussions: The definition of a field supposes simultaneity?
  1. Definition of (Replies: 2)