The doppler effect on light (red and blue shifts)

kashiark
Messages
210
Reaction score
0
what does the doppler effect mean for an individual photon? for instance in a blue shift do the photons actually have more energy if they were originally a lower frequency?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The doppler effect is only true for the observer and it's point of view. Let's say that a red light photon is observed by a standing observer. A different observer that is in relative motion from the first one in the direction of the light source will observe a slightly blueshifted light, a more energetical ray ( orange yellow green etc ) in accordance with it's speed relative to the "red light standing observer". If the second observer were to move along the direction of the light he would see a less energetical ray ( infrared microwave etc). It's not a complicated thing to understand, because it all comes down to the energy that can e extracted from a wave particle system.

A baseball flying towards you would transfer a certain amount of energy if it hits you. if you move towards it you will receive more energy if you move along it's direction you will receive less.

Let's say a highly energetic particle is moving towards the earth. From our point of view that particle has a fixed amount of energy and a fixed speed. The particle on the other hand would see a object of huge mass traveling close to the speed of light towards it. There is no point in finding out what energy our Earth would have if it was traveling at near light speed, because the particle would never be able to extract more energy than it itself has, out of the system. Photons are energy waves so they will change in accordance with the system of observation, their wavelength that is.
 
kashiark said:
what does the doppler effect mean for an individual photon? for instance in a blue shift do the photons actually have more energy if they were originally a lower frequency?
The answer to your question is yes.
 
thanks guys :biggrin:
 
Lok said:
A baseball flying towards you would transfer a certain amount of energy if it hits you. if you move towards it you will receive more energy if you move along it's direction you will receive less.

I think that is misleading. The ball transfers more or less energy to you because its speed relative to you at impact is higher or lower. that is no true for light, it always hits you at c, but it has more or less energy because of the doppler shift.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Back
Top