The Effects of Distance and Mass on the Casimir Force

  • Thread starter Thread starter r637h
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Casimir effect
AI Thread Summary
The Casimir Force, calculated as F=A/d^4, is a quantum effect arising from reduced vacuum energy density between closely spaced plates, not influenced by gravitational or electrostatic forces. The correct formula for the force includes constants such as Planck's constant and the speed of light, indicating a stronger attraction as the distance decreases. While gravitational attraction between the plates is typically negligible, calculations can be made to compare it with the Casimir Force at specific separations. Recent interest in the Casimir effect highlights its potential applications in microtechnology. Overall, the discussion clarifies misconceptions about the forces involved in the Casimir effect.
r637h
This is a simple (and possibly not very bright) question:

We know that F=A/d^4 for the Casimir Force (~10^-7 N for two cm^2 plates).

Does the gravitational attraction between the masses of the plates not figure?

I once thought that this was not an EM effect as such or at least doesn't depend on EM waves passing 'through' between the plates. Is that right?

Are various other possible forces factored out, or simply just don't apply?

I should know the answer, but for now, I'm stumped.

Thanks, Rudi
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Casimir Force is dependent on neither graviational nor electrostatic attraction. From what I vaguely remember, it is a quantum effect that can be thought of as being due to a difference in virtual photon pressure.

eNtRopY
 
Originally posted by r637h
This is a simple (and possibly not very bright) question:

We know that F=A/d^4 for the Casimir Force (~10^-7 N for two cm^2 plates).

Does the gravitational attraction between the masses of the plates not figure?...

Are various other possible forces factored out, or simply just don't apply?
Rudi
Interesting question, Rudi.

Casimir predicted (according to QED) a reduced vacuum energy density between two closely spaced plates (due to truncating of virtual photon modes)which results in an attractive force. That force increases (by the inverse 4th power) as the distance d, between the plates decreases. You formula is not exactly correct. The correct formula is:

F = [pi]hcA/(480 d^4)

h=Planck's; A = area of plates; c= speed of light; d = distance between plates.

To answer your question. Usually any measurement is done with flat neutral plates to null electrostatic force; (the distance must be very small to get a Casimir force that is measureable.) However, I've never seen any calculation done to accommodate adjustments due to gravitational attraction, which I assume would be too small to matter. How...ever, just to make sure, try using small plate mass (say, somewhere between 10 to 50 grams) and 1 cm^2 to calculate grav.F using Newtonian eqn. Depending on the plate thickness, R (distance between the center of plate thickness) could be about maybe .5 to 6 mm. (F=Gmm/R^2)

Then compare that grav. F value with the Casimir Force (using the formula above) OR: set the 2 eqns. equal to one another to see at what plate separation the Casimir force would be comparable to mutual gravitational attraction, (see below.) It may be interesting.

Creator

Gmm/R^2 = [pi]hcA/480 d^4
solving for d and assuming d<<R:
d = 4th root[[pi](R^2)hcA/480 Gm^2]

However then you will need to determine if, at that separation, the force will be great enough to be measureable.
 
Last edited:
To Creator:

Many Thanks: I didn't realize that the simple equation, which I have seen cited, wasn't correct. Your equation makes a lot more sense, explaining the EM phenomenon relationship.

In particular, thanks for the gravity measure suggestion. (If I don't find it in the literature; we have Igor and Spook, down in the basement, who'll gladly do the experiment for an extra ration of gruel or swill.*) If anything significant is found, I'll let you know.
As you suggest, it may be considered insignificant on paper.

Of course, Casimir effect has gained new prominence lately: Applications in Microtechnology.

*( Sorry, weak attempt at humor.)

Again Many Thanks, Rudi.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
Back
Top