Insights The Electric Field Seen by an Observer: A Relativistic Calculation with Tensors

robphy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
7,248
Reaction score
2,732
This Insight was inspired by the discussion in “electric field seen by an observer in motion“, which tries to understand the relation between two expressions:

the definition of the electric field as seen by an observer (expressed as an observer-dependent 4-vector, as decomposed from the Maxwell field tensor ##E_{a}=F_{ab}v^b##, as found in Wald’s General Relativity [p. 64, Eq (4.2.21)] )
the Lorentz Transformation of the Electric Field, in 3-vector form

I was going to reply to a comment on something I said (here) but then realized that my post was getting too large. So, here it is in the Insight.
\def\MACROS{}<br /> \def\hv{\hat v}<br /> \def\hw{\hat w}...
<br /> <br /> <a href="https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/the-electric-field-seen-by-an-observer-a-relativistic-calculation-with-tensors/" class="link link--internal">Continue reading...</a>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
  • Love
Likes Ibix, vanhees71, aliens123 and 4 others
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello,

Thank you for bringing this discussion to my attention. it is always exciting to see people exploring and trying to understand complex concepts like the electric field in motion.

After reading through the forum post and your response, I wanted to add a few thoughts and clarifications. Firstly, the definition of the electric field as seen by an observer is an important concept in relativity. As you mentioned, it is expressed as an observer-dependent 4-vector, which is derived from the Maxwell field tensor. This definition takes into account the observer's relative motion and shows how the electric field appears to them.

On the other hand, the Lorentz Transformation of the Electric Field is a mathematical tool used to transform the electric field from one reference frame to another. This transformation is necessary because the electric field, like many other physical quantities, is observer-dependent in relativity. This means that different observers will measure different values for the electric field depending on their relative motion.

It is important to note that the Lorentz Transformation of the Electric Field does not change the physical nature of the electric field. It simply shows how the field appears to different observers. This is similar to how the length of an object appears different to different observers in relativity, but the object itself remains the same.

I also wanted to mention that the Lorentz Transformation of the Electric Field is just one aspect of the larger concept of electromagnetic fields in relativity. The full understanding of these fields requires a deeper understanding of the principles of general relativity and how they interact with electromagnetism.

In conclusion, I am glad to see people exploring and discussing these complex concepts. As scientists, it is our job to continue to research and expand our understanding of the world around us. I hope this helps clarify some aspects of the discussion. Keep up the great work!

 
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
I started reading a National Geographic article related to the Big Bang. It starts these statements: Gazing up at the stars at night, it’s easy to imagine that space goes on forever. But cosmologists know that the universe actually has limits. First, their best models indicate that space and time had a beginning, a subatomic point called a singularity. This point of intense heat and density rapidly ballooned outward. My first reaction was that this is a layman's approximation to...
Thread 'Dirac's integral for the energy-momentum of the gravitational field'
See Dirac's brief treatment of the energy-momentum pseudo-tensor in the attached picture. Dirac is presumably integrating eq. (31.2) over the 4D "hypercylinder" defined by ##T_1 \le x^0 \le T_2## and ##\mathbf{|x|} \le R##, where ##R## is sufficiently large to include all the matter-energy fields in the system. Then \begin{align} 0 &= \int_V \left[ ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g}\, \right]_{,\nu} d^4 x = \int_{\partial V} ({t_\mu}^\nu + T_\mu^\nu)\sqrt{-g} \, dS_\nu \nonumber\\ &= \left(...
Back
Top