Medical The Four Temperaments: Is san-mel possible?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Eus
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the validity of the Four Temperaments theory, specifically the possibility of a person embodying both sanguine and melancholic traits simultaneously. The original poster questions how one can be both sloppy (sanguine) and neat (melancholic). Responses highlight that the Four Temperaments are considered outdated in modern psychology, which now relies more on neuroscience and the DSM IV for understanding behavior and psychiatric disorders. Participants suggest that while the Four Temperaments may have historical significance, contemporary psychology has evolved significantly, and individuals interested in current theories should refer to modern psychology textbooks. The conversation emphasizes the need for updated knowledge in the field, moving beyond archaic concepts.
Eus
Messages
93
Reaction score
0
Hi Ho!

Referring to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Temperaments under "Temperament Blends", I would like to discuss whether it is possible for a person to have a blend of sanguine and melancholic at the same time.

AFAIK, a sanguine tends to be sloppy while a melancholic tends to be perfectionist. How then can one person be sloppy and neat at the same time?

If I am not in the right forum to discuss this, please give me a pointer to a better one. Thanks.


Eus
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Such concepts as the four temperaments are VERY outdated. Modern psychology would only teach them from an historical perspective to show how far we've come since then, not because there is any validity to the ideas.
 
Um.. original poster - you're joking, right? This is like asking an alchemy question under 'chemistry'.
 
Hi Ho!

Moonbear:
What is the most recent concept accepted among modern psychology scholars?

alxm:
No, I'm not joking. I am not a psychology guy and trying to find the truth out :-)
"alchemy" under "chemistry"? I didn't realize that it is the situation. In that case, what is the right concept?

No offense, but I'd like to be sure of this: you guys are modern psychology scholars, aren't you? I just want to be sure that it is not the blind leading another blind.

Thanks for helping :-)


Eus
 
Nowadays, we explain most behavior through neuroscience (or strive to). Accepted psychiatric disorders are defined in the DSM IV, which is a rather large volume. And, yes, the four temperaments is along the lines of alchemy in terms of how completely outdated it is.
 
Eus,
We here are not all psycology scholars. Look for a modern introductory psychology textbook. As other members have commented, psychology today has advanced from what it was 50 years ago. I would best guess that psychology textbooks from the 1950's would have nearly nothing to say about Autism or Asperger's Syndrome, or the Silicon Valley effect (frequency of Autism spectrum resulting individuals in the Silicon Valley area).
 
Personality psychology is still an active area of study. There are quite a few theories you can read about here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Personality_psychology

I am inclined to agree with the others that the Four Temperament theory is archaic, but good to know about to understand historical foundations of this branch of psychology.

(I have a psych degree, but only a BS, and in the cognitive area. :smile:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
100
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
28K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top