The generator of time translation

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
It is not hard to show that for QM what takes the wave function from t->t+Δt is the exponential of the hamiltonian. Yet for some mysterious reason my book decides to note the Hamiltonian as the generator of time translation rather than the exponential of it. What is the reason for this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the theory of lie groups a generator is defined as the element of the tangential lie algebra that generates the group element. The map from the lie algebra to the lie group is the exponential, so the generator of time evolution is the hamiltonian and the one dimensional subgroup it generates is the time evolution exp(i H t).

You find the same situation for the momentum operator and the spatial translation group it generates. And angular momentum operators generate rotations.
 
Books on QM tend to speak from the perspective of group theory, even though they don't/may not contain chapters on Lie groups/algebras and their applications to quantum physics.
 
The lie algebra has to do with what happens close to the identity. We can take what is given: e^{-i\hat{H}t} is the generator of finite time translations, and see how this portrays the Hamiltonian.
<br /> e^{-i\hat{H}\epsilon / \hbar}\psi(x,t) = \psi(x,t+\epsilon)<br />
now for \epsilon \approx 0 we can write
<br /> \psi(x,t)-\frac{i\hat{H}\epsilon}{\hbar}\psi(x,t) +\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2) = \psi(x,t)+ \left. \frac{\partial \psi(x,t)}{\partial t}\right|_{t=\epsilon}\epsilon +\mathcal{O}(\epsilon^2)<br />
thus
<br /> \hat{H} = i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial t}<br />
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top