The Greiner Series: Undergraduate Friendly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ganymede
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Greiner series, particularly its introductory Quantum text, which some have compared to the Landau-Lifshitz series. While the Greiner series is noted for its comprehensive examples, it is considered quite advanced and not necessarily suitable for undergraduates. Participants express that although the books are good, there are likely better alternatives for Quantum Mechanics (QM) and Quantum Field Theory (QFT) that are more accessible to undergraduate students. Concerns about typos in earlier editions are acknowledged, with later editions reportedly correcting these issues. Overall, the consensus leans towards the Greiner series being less undergraduate-friendly than desired.
ganymede
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Does anyone have any experience with the Greiner series, specifically his introductory Quantum text ? I have heard it being touted as the new Landau and was wondering if the series is undergraduate friendly. I am well aware that there are quite a few typos (supposably corrected in later editions) but the prospect of examples worked out in their entirety is rather appealing.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
No,they cannot be compared with the L-L series,for thousands of reasons.They are good books,right now i have the SM course on my desk and probably will use it for the SM exam.
They're pretty advanced,i don't know what u mean by "undergraduate friendly".But for QM & QFT I'm sure there are dozens of better books.


Daniel.
 
dextercioby said:
No,they cannot be compared with the L-L series,for thousands of reasons.They are good books,right now i have the SM course on my desk and probably will use it for the SM exam.
They're pretty advanced,i don't know what u mean by "undergraduate friendly".But for QM & QFT I'm sure there are dozens of better books.


Daniel.

By undergraduate friendly, I mean something that can be read and understood, to some extent, by an undergraduate. Specifically and undergraduate who is going to be enrolled in a QM course.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Back
Top