The ground state e- is the largest negative value, but why?

shangriphysics
Messages
32
Reaction score
1
Hi Physics Forums!

The ground state electron is the largest negative value, but what does this mean?

Does this mean that kinetic energy is a positive value above zero?

It seems at the ground state, the electron might also have kinetic energy as it is moving around as well as potential energy...

It seems like the scientists, when they talked about the lowest ground state, meant lowest potential energy similar to that of gravitational potential energy.

I'm trying to see this in terms of kinetic energy and potential energy, especially when we excite the electron with kinetic energy.

A: I think that when we excite the electron, the electron was at it's quantized potential energy, and then turns into kinetic energy, and drops back down to potential energy.

I was also confused on how we measure the electron volts, or potential energy of a ground state electron?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electron in its ground state has the lowest possible value for its total energy. That total energy can be negative, as it might be in the ground state of an atom, in which case, we could say that the energy of an electron in its ground state is at its "most negative".

The kinetic energy of an electron when measured will always have some value greater than zero. The potential energy can be negative, depending on what the potential energy function is.

The total energy (kinetic plus potential) is what's quantized for an electron in an atom. When an electron absorbs a photon, its total energy increases by the amount of the energy of the absorbed photon,

An electron-volt is the amount of energy an electron gains when it moves to a location where the electric potential is one volt lower than where it started.

To measure the energy levels of electrons in atoms, we shine light at known frequencies at it, and see how the atoms respond to the light. Since the energy of a photon is directly proportional to its frequency by Planck's constant, we can figure out what the energy differences between the energy levels of an atom are by knowing which frequencies the atom interacts with most strongly.

Hope this helps :)
 
  • Like
Likes shangriphysics
shangriphysics said:
I'm trying to see this in terms of kinetic energy and potential energy, especially when we excite the electron with kinetic energy.

That's generally not a helpful way of understanding a bound electron. The problem is that the energy eigenstates of a bound electron are not position eigenstates; the electron has no single definite position in these states. The potential ##V(r)## is a function of the position, so the electron also has no definite potential energy in these states. Thus, there is no useful way of splitting the total energy (which does have a definite value) into potential and kinetic components; all you have a statistical distribution of what you would get if you were to somehow measure one or the other.
 
  • Like
Likes shangriphysics and jfizzix
Thank you everyone! This makes a lot more sense now. Phew. Physics is so weird!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top