The Hierarchy Problem: A Problematic Relationship between High and Low Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter fxdung
  • Start date Start date
fxdung
Messages
387
Reaction score
23
Why are hierarchies problematic? How are the hierarchy problem related with fine-tunning problem?

Saying that at high energy, some theories are united to one theory(example GUT).Which is high energy,the high energy of collision real particles or the high energy of high momentum loop integrals in loop corrections?
One same question when a theory is spontaneous broken to some theories.
If the high energy is the energy of collision real particles(not of virtue particle) then why the large relate with the small in hierarchy problem?
If the large not relate with the small,why hierarchy problem is problematic?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now I think the momenta of real and virtue particle are related and the parameters at low and high energy are related with each other by renormalization group equations,so the high energy is the both.Then the loop corrections cause hierarchy problematic thing.Perhap one solution is to point out some cancelations between the loop corrections if we do not want to change to other theory different from Standard Model such as SUSY.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Naeem Anwar
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top