The Intimidation of Retraining to a Career in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter pilotofphysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Career Physics
AI Thread Summary
Returning to academics for a PhD in physics, particularly in astronomy, cosmology, or theoretical physics, is feasible for individuals with a background in aerospace engineering and leadership. While the transition may seem daunting due to the prerequisites often required for physics programs, the mathematical skills acquired during an engineering degree can be advantageous. It's important to prepare for the Physics GRE, as strong scores can significantly enhance admission prospects. Many successful candidates have transitioned from diverse fields, including military backgrounds, demonstrating that varied experiences can be valuable in academia. Researching potential graduate programs is crucial, focusing on departments that are active and well-funded in the desired research area. Engaging with resources like the PhysicsGRE forums and the American Institute of Physics can provide further guidance on program selection and preparation strategies.
pilotofphysics
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello, all.

I'm new to the forums but thought this might be the venue to ask a question I am pondering.

I'm looking into the possibilities of returning to academics and pursuing a PhD in physics with an emphasis in astronomy and cosmology or possibly theoretical physics (haven't narrowed that one down much). I'm wondering, however, the feasibility of the course of action given my background and goals. Any advice folks out there have for me, please pipe up.

A little about me:

My undergrad is in Aerospace Engineering, and I have learned that I'm not terribly interested in that level of practicality; I believe my desires lie more in the realm of theory. I have a Masters of Arts in Administrative Leadership (think leadership theory and organizational behavior). I completed my undergrad in 2006 and have since been an officer in the US Air Force. I am a pilot in said organization, first as a mobility pilot (KC-10 air refuelers) and currently as a combat pilot (MQ-9 remotely piloted aircraft). While this is clearly a practical and operational application of both my undergrad and Master's degrees, I will mostly likely be leaving the Air Force upon the completion of my commitment in a few years.

I've done some research into the prerequisites required for most traditional physics PhD programs, and am becoming slightly intimidated that I will have to start from scratch on this path. My desire would be to transition directly into a physics PhD program. Would that even be a possibility? I'm also afraid that my experience would not bring anything to the table, so to speak, and would feel like wasted time.

I'm sure I'll have more questions, but if anyone knowledgeable has advice for me, I would be grateful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, pilotofphysics!

Your degree, since it's at least in engineering, isn't a total waste. You'll make good use of the math you learned.

Here's a thread about going to grad school in physics when your degree isn't physics:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=64966

That's full of good information, I advise reading it from the beginning.
 
Head over to PhysicsGRE forums, this is a great resource to prepare for the PGRE which you're no doubt going to take if you want to get a PhD in the US, and you'll find many cases of people in your situation going back to grad school coming from a variety of backgrounds. I would get started preparing for it ASAP, enrollment for the exam opens up in about a month.

I remember seeing a case this year (see the 2013 results thread) of one foreign chemical engineer who worked for a few years, managed to do some physics research on his own time and later applied and was accepted into almost every program he applied for (research emphasis on relativity/numerical relativity). Also several cases of former military officers who got into very competitive schools.

I gather coming from Aerospace your background is even closer to a Physics bachelors than Chem E. so I'm sure you would have no trouble academically speaking. If you get some good scores on the GRE's and get rec letters from people who know your research/work and/or academic capability (profs), I think you would have a really good chance of getting into almost any school you apply to, if you do make sound, thoroughly researched choices of grad schools. Things like making sure the departments you're applying for are active and well-funded in your chosen research field. You could also narrow it down a little more than just cosmology or theory: observational/survey work? CMB? Solid state theory? Cosmological modeling? You'd have a list of different universities for each. You'll find most of the gritty details on grad schools, their research activity, endowments, and number of students enrolled and graduated each year at the American Institute of Physics webpage and gradschoolshopper (which gets most of their data from them, apparently).
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top