The jacobian matrix of partial derivatives?

andlook
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
In differential geometry what does df mean as in


<br /> <br /> \mbox{f} : \mathbb{R}^m \mbox{ to } \mathbb{R}^n

Then df is what? the jacobian matrix of partial derivatives?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org


More generally, suppose the map f is a differentiable map is defined on an open set U of R^m:
f:U\rightarrow\mathbb{R}^n

In differential geometry, we define on each point x of U the tangent space to U at x as the vector space T_x\mathbb{R}^m consisting of pairs (x,v), where v\in\mathbb{R}^m and where addition and scalar multiplication are defined by (x,v) + (x,w) = (x,v+w) and a(x,v) = (x,av). A vector (x,v)\in T_x\mathbb{R}^m is to be interpreted as "the vector v "at" x". Then we form the tangent bundle of U
<br /> TU:=\bigcup_{x\in U}T_xU<br />
Then df is defined as the map df:TU\rightarrow T\mathbb{R}^n that associates to (x,v)\in T_xU the element (f(x),Df(x)v)\in T_{f(x)}\mathbb{R}^n, where Df(x) is the usual derivative of f at x in the sense of calculus or analysis.
 


andlook said:
In differential geometry what does df mean as in


<br /> <br /> \mbox{f} : \mathbb{R}^m \mbox{ to } \mathbb{R}^n

Then df is what? the jacobian matrix of partial derivatives?
Strictly speaking, df is the linear transformation that best approximates f (in the same way that y= mx+ b best approximates f(x) at x= a when m= f'(a)). Given the standard bases for Rm and Rn, that is represented by the Jacobian matrix.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top