The James Webb Space Telescope

546 replies · 80K views · last reply
Kevin the Kiwi said:
I wonder if someone can answer a question for me. Probably a silly question but I am looking at the "star death" image, the planetary nebula. It looks like we are looking through a big hole in a spherical object, or is it a flat ring around the star we are looking at from above? The main reason for my question is that you can see the gas and dust inside the nebula that looks like behind the star it is a solid wall. I imagine when the star explodes it blows stuff out in all directions.
It is a spherical shell, but you are looking through less material in the center as along the edges (see sketch), so it makes it look like an annular ring. The material you say is "behind the star" is both in front of and behind the star.

Sketch of a blue annular ring with two black arrows pointing up at its outer edge, one at the lower left and one at the bottom, showing the line-of-sight paths through a shell.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Kevin the Kiwi, BillTre and Oldman too
phyzguy said:
It is a spherical shell, but you are looking through less material in the center as along the edges (see sketch), so it makes it look like an annular ring. The material you say is "behind the star" is both in front of and behind the star.

View attachment 304135

Ah yes, that makes complete sense, I honestly never would have thought of that. Thank you for your reply.
 
Jupiter rendered in false-colour near-infrared, with bright banded cloud belts and the Great Red Spot at lower right; the moon Europa appears as a small star-like point at left.


“Jupiter, center, and its moon Europa, left, are seen through the James Webb Space Telescope’s NIRCam instrument 2.12 micron filter. Credits: NASA, ESA, CSA, and B. Holler and J. Stansberry (STScI)”
https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/07...and-more-now-available-in-commissioning-data/

Two side-by-side false-colour infrared images of Jupiter: left F212N with orange bands and labelled moons Europa and Thebe; right F323N, yellow-glowing disc with Thebe and Metis labelled.

“Two photos of Jupiter taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. The left image was taken using a NIRCam (near infrared camera) to examine the planet’s short wavelengths of light. The right image was taken with a filter that highlights long wavelengths. NASA”

https://globalnews.ca/news/8987398/james-webb-space-telescope-pictures-jupiter-why-you-missed-them/
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, DennisN and BWV

Webb telescope suffered ‘uncorrectable damage’ in micrometeoroid hit, NASA report says​

https://thehill.com/policy/technolo...amage-in-micrometeoroid-hit-nasa-report-says/

At 21 feet, Webb’s gold-plated, flower-shaped mirror is the biggest and most sensitive ever sent into space. It’s comprised of 18 segments, one of which was smacked by the bigger than anticipated micrometeoroid in May. Micrometeoroids are fragments of asteroids that are usually smaller than a grain of sand, according to NASA.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/webb-telescope-suffered-uncorrectable-damage-030948640.html
 
  • Sad
  • Wow
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, DennisN, vanhees71 and 2 others
Here's a new video from the Royal Institution:
(I haven't seen it yet, but I wanted to share it)

Solar system science from the James Webb Space Telescope – with Naomi Rowe-Gurney (RI)
What is the JWST, and what big science questions can it answer? Join NASA scientist Naomi as she discusses the new JWST images, along with her research into the ice giants, Uranus and Neptune, and the many other areas that JWST can help with.


Edit: And the Q&A is here:

Q&A: Solar system science from the James Webb Space Telescope – with Naomi Rowe-Gurney (RI)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too, collinsmark, vanhees71 and 2 others
I was surprised at the nomenclature -- Population III stars in the oldest galaxies. I would have guessed that the numbering would run the other direction. I looked it up and learned that my understanding was backwards.

Every day on PF I get to learn something new. :smile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, Oldman too and Astronuc
Astronomy has the interesting practice that nothing ever gets re-defined. Hipparchus defined the magnitude scale almost 3000 more than 2000 years ago, and called the brightest stars 1st magnitude, the next brightest 2nd magnitude, and so on. So we are stuck with a magnitude scale that runs backwards - where brighter stars have a smaller magnitude than dimmer stars.

Population I and Population II were defined before anyone knew why they were different and that Population II came before Population I.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and anorlunda
phyzguy said:
Astronomy has the interesting practice that nothing ever gets re-defined. Hipparchus defined the magnitude scale almost 3000 more than 2000 years ago, and called the brightest stars 1st magnitude, the next brightest 2nd magnitude, and so on. So we are stuck with a magnitude scale that runs backwards - where brighter stars have a smaller magnitude than dimmer stars.

Population I and Population II were defined before anyone knew why they were different and that Population II came before Population I.

The numbering makes sense to me. You know you can see the brightest stars, and who the heck knows how many classifications you're going to want for the stars you can't see yet.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and Oldman too
phinds said:
@Devin-M are we supposed to guess what those are?
Screenshot of the STScI MAST Archive portal showing a table of JWST NIRCam observations with a list of observation IDs and RA and Dec columns, beside an AstroView panel showing a nebula with white instrument footprint outlines.
Here's what it would look like through a 2000mm telescope in Stellarium:
Stellarium simulation of a star field with bright blue nebulous regions and a reddish knot, with a red rectangular field-of-view outline and an HIP star label at the bottom, showing the sky as seen through a 2000mm telescope.

RA 11h06m18.79s Dec -77º22'50.9"

James Webb NIRCam:
Grayscale two-panel mosaic of a faint nebular field dotted with stars, with bright diffraction spikes radiating from the brightest stars across both panels.


100% Crop:
Grayscale deep-field astronomy image of a star field with diffraction-spiked bright stars, several faint elongated galaxies and round galaxy cores, and a diffuse background glow.
 
Last edited:
Office_Shredder said:
The numbering makes sense to me. You know you can see the brightest stars, and who the heck knows how many classifications you're going to want for the stars you can't see yet.
When it was just a numbering classification, it made perfect sense, which is why Hipparchus defined it that way. But later, when quantitative measurements of brightness arrived, we turned it into a quantitative magnitude scale for measuring brightness. After doing that, we really would rather have a brighter object have a larger magnitude. But that would mean re-defining the scale. So today, the faintest objects we can see with our eyes are m=6.0, the faintest objects seen in large telescopes are about m=30.0 and the sun is m=-26.
 
RA 01:07:47.200 DEC -17:30:25.00
JWST NIRCam Bi-Color, F150W & F200W Filters, 2319s exp per filter
Processed w/ SiriL, Adobe Photoshop & Lightroom
Bi-color near-infrared image of a galaxy pair on a black background, with a bright orange-white central core, scattered golden star clusters, and a smaller spiral galaxy at upper left.


100% Crop:
Infrared telescope image of a dusty star-forming region showing a bright, clumpy field of orange and white star clusters, with a small spiral galaxy in the upper left and a bright glow at the bottom.

Screenshot of the MAST Advanced Search results table with a Mast Portal list of JWST observations, alongside an Aladin Lite sky view showing a bright galaxy-like object inside a white rotated footprint outline.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Maarten Havinga and Oldman too
RA 2:17:46 DEC -05:16:15
JWST NIRCam 7-29-22 12:04
Deep-field astronomical image of a dark sky scattered with small galaxies and a few bright foreground stars with diffraction spikes, crossed by faint diagonal streaks from the telescope's optics.

Deep-field astronomy image of a dark sky scattered with many small, faint galaxies, with diagonal diffraction spikes and streaks from bright stars running across the frame.

Deep-space astronomy image on a black background showing many small elongated and spiral galaxies in green and white, with a larger bluish-green spiral galaxy near the center-left.

Screenshot of the MAST Advanced Search web portal listing NIRCam and MIRI observations with filters and a results table, beside an AstroView panel showing sky footprints.
 
Last edited:
  • Love
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Oldman too and anorlunda