The lowest centre of mass while filling a cup of water?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding the height of water in a cylindrical mug that minimizes the center of mass when the mug is filled. The mug's mass is denoted as m, and when full of water, the total mass is 4m. The user attempts to set up an equation for the moments of the empty mug and the water, leading to a quadratic equation for the center of mass. However, difficulties arise during differentiation, resulting in a negative value for k, which is not valid. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly differentiating the derived expression to find the optimal height of water.
Aihara
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Ok, there's a cylindrical mug of mass m. When full of water it has a mass 4m. Assuming the base of the mug has no mass, how full is the water in the mug when the centre of mass is the closest to the base? (as a proportion of the height of the mug I'm guessing)



The Attempt at a Solution


I was trying to set up an equation with the sum of the bits equals the whole thing..
Moment of empty mug: mh/2
Moment of water: I think I get this bit wrong. it takes 3m of water to fill the cup, so 3m=h

But basically I then added the moments of the empty mug and water and equated it to total mass of the system multiplied by the COM.
I tried to differentiate to find a minimum but I had an h and a h^2 which didn't leave me with a nice answer in terms of h.

I rushed this, but if what I have said isn't clear I will make it clear when I come back to it later :)
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show exactly what you did. You'll get a bit of a messy expression for the center of mass as a function of water height. But when you do the differentiation and simplify, you'll end up with a quadratic equation. You'll get a nice answer as a fraction of the cylinder height.
 
yep ok

Moment of Empty mug = mh/2

When the water has depth h, the mass is 3m.
Take mass of water as km where 0\leq k \leq3
therefore height of water = hk/3
and moment of water is mass x distance from base = km*(hk/3)*1/2 = ((k^2)mh)/6

Moment of the whole system = (m+km)Y (where Y = centre of mass of whole system)


So, mh/2 + (1/6)*(k^2)*m*h = m(1+k)Y
cancel m's
h/2 + (1/6)*(k^2)*h = (1+k)Y

Y= h/(2(1+k)) + ((k^2)*h)/6(1+k)
Y=(h/2)(1/(1+k) + (k^2)/(3(1+k))
so I have centre of mass of the system in turns of k, the mass of the water... (not the water height)

But if I differentiate, and equate to - that should give me the value of k that is a minimum (?)

this gets complicated when I differentiate
dY/dk = (h/2)((-1/(2(k+1)^2)+(k(k+2))/(3(k+1)^2)
So the bit in the brackets equals 0.
Rearranging and cancelling I get k^2 + 2k + 1.5 = 0
Using the formula this gives, (-2+rt(3))/2 (a negative number for k, which is no good)

I'm not sure if what I have put is understandable, but thanks for helping ^^
 
Aihara said:
yep ok

Moment of Empty mug = mh/2

When the water has depth h, the mass is 3m.
Take mass of water as km where 0\leq k \leq3
therefore height of water = hk/3
and moment of water is mass x distance from base = km*(hk/3)*1/2 = ((k^2)mh)/6

Moment of the whole system = (m+km)Y (where Y = centre of mass of whole system)


So, mh/2 + (1/6)*(k^2)*m*h = m(1+k)Y
cancel m's
h/2 + (1/6)*(k^2)*h = (1+k)Y

Y= h/(2(1+k)) + ((k^2)*h)/6(1+k)
Y=(h/2)(1/(1+k) + (k^2)/(3(1+k))
so I have centre of mass of the system in turns of k, the mass of the water... (not the water height)

But if I differentiate, and equate to - that should give me the value of k that is a minimum (?)
Looks good.

this gets complicated when I differentiate
dY/dk = (h/2)((-1/(2(k+1)^2)+(k(k+2))/(3(k+1)^2)
Redo that derivative.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top