The mass of an object warps/bends/disturbs spacetime. But does the

  • Thread starter Thread starter PeterShaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Spacetime
PeterShaw
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The mass of an object warps/bends/disturbs spacetime. But does the active warping/bending of spacetime create mass/energy?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


PeterShaw said:
The mass of an object warps/bends/disturbs spacetime. But does the active warping/bending of spacetime create mass/energy?

Yes. From the Einstein field equations the cause of having a non-vanishing curvature of spacetime is a non-zero energy-momentum tensor which demonstrates the presence of matter and gravitational fields (the latter would not be always the reason for having a curved spacetime).

AB
 


PeterShaw said:
The mass of an object warps/bends/disturbs spacetime. But does the active warping/bending of spacetime create mass/energy?
One does not go without the other. Who knows, perhaps they are the same thing.
 


"Creates" is different from "goes together with". I think the last is more appropriate with mass and bending. What else than mass can bend spacetime? So if you create more mass, by turning energy into mass, then you create more bending.
 


How does entropy affect spacetime? Is this a fair statement to make...'If entropy is a measure of disorder, than as the disorder of a system increases spacetime flattens?'
 


PeterShaw said:
How does entropy affect spacetime? Is this a fair statement to make...'If entropy is a measure of disorder, than as the disorder of a system increases spacetime flattens?'

In local regions less momentum and energy density will mean less curvature, but as a whole the universe wouldn't flatten as a result.
 
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...

Similar threads

Back
Top