The modern view of decoherence: A layperson's qestion

  • Thread starter Thread starter Galteeth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decoherence
Galteeth
Messages
69
Reaction score
1
While I understand that the a single quantum can indeed exist in a superposition, does the interaction of various quanta exist in superpositions as well? If so, is the idea of a limit on the number of these interactions before a definite state is reached what is referred to as decoherence, and if that is correct what is the number of interactions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, reaching a definite state is NOT called decoherence.
 
Demystifier said:
First of all, reaching a definite state is NOT called decoherence.

I have been confused by wikipedia.
 
Galteeth said:
I have been confused by wikipedia.
A citation from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decoherence :
"Decoherence does not generate actual wave function collapse. It only provides an explanation for the appearance of wavefunction collapse. ... Moreover, our observation tells us that this mixture looks like a proper quantum ensemble in a measurement situation, as we observe that measurements lead to the "realization" of precicely one state in the "ensemble". But within the framework of the interpretation of quantum mechanics, decoherence cannot explain this crucial step from an apparent mixture to the existence and/or perception of single outcomes."
 
Demystifier said:
A citation from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decoherence :
"Decoherence does not generate actual wave function collapse. It only provides an explanation for the appearance of wavefunction collapse. ... Moreover, our observation tells us that this mixture looks like a proper quantum ensemble in a measurement situation, as we observe that measurements lead to the "realization" of precicely one state in the "ensemble". But within the framework of the interpretation of quantum mechanics, decoherence cannot explain this crucial step from an apparent mixture to the existence and/or perception of single outcomes."

Yes, after going back and reading more carefully, i actually got that on my own.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top