The Mpemba Effect: Conditions Needed for Occurrence

  • Thread starter Thread starter binis
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Mpemba effect, which suggests that hot water can freeze faster than cold water under certain conditions. However, the specific conditions required for this effect to reliably occur remain unclear. It is speculated that a large surface area to volume ratio in a low humidity environment may facilitate the effect by allowing more evaporation, which could lead to faster cooling and freezing. The conversation also touches on the complexities of heat transfer, emphasizing that factors such as the shape and material of the container, air circulation, and the thermal properties of water play significant roles. There is skepticism regarding the validity of certain claims and research related to the Mpemba effect, with some participants questioning the credibility of a paper presented in the discussion. The thread concludes with a reminder of forum rules against discussing original research, leading to its closure.
binis
Messages
101
Reaction score
8
TL;DR Summary
Mpemba effect conditions
What are the conditions needed to occur the effect?
 
  • Like
Likes atyy
Chemistry news on Phys.org
binis said:
What are the conditions needed to occur the effect?
The answer to that isn't clear. It isn't clear whether there are any conditions that would reliably enable the effect to occur. And it is certainly only possible if one of the parameters of the experiment you might expect to be constant actually isn't. My best speculation is you might be able to cause it to occur if you have a large surface area to volume ratio in a low humidity environment, which causes a significant fraction of the hot water to evaporate, enabling the remaining water to cool and freeze faster than if the full amount were present.
 
  • Like
Likes binis and atyy
binis said:
Summary:: Mpemba effect conditions

What are the conditions needed to occur the effect?

This forum has had a large number of threads on this topic, in addition to the numerous hits one can obtained in a google search.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and binis
ZapperZ said:
This forum has had a large number of threads on this topic
Really? I was looked for before post but failed.Could you please show me some?
 
binis said:
Really? I was looked for before post but failed.Could you please show me some?

On PC in the right upper corner of the window there is a "search" command. Using it to look for "mpemba" yields four pages of hits.
 
  • Like
Likes binis and Bystander
russ_watters said:
The answer to that isn't clear. It isn't clear whether there are any conditions that would reliably enable the effect to occur. And it is certainly only possible if one of the parameters of the experiment you might expect to be constant actually isn't.
I agree.According to Newton's law of cooling, if we set as surrounding temperature To=0 => ΔT=T-To=T, during the cooling of a material body the rate of temperature decrease (cooling rate=q) is proportional to the temperature (T): dQ=mcdT= κAΔΤdt = κATdt => dT/dt=hT=q
where t is the time & h is the heat transfer coefficient.The greater the value of h, the higher is the cooling rate, q so more likely to occur Mpemba effect: this is my aspect claimed in my published article.Heat transfer coefficient is dependent upon the physical properties of the water (such as m:mass,c: specific heat) and the physical situation (such as A:interface area,κ: thermal diffusivity).However, h is affected by much many factors such as the container’s shape and material and the air circulation within the freezer, among others.Thus, the Mpemba effect is hard to predict and is not observed in every instance.
 
binis said:
this is my aspect claimed in my published article

So you have come here pretending you ask questions, while in fact you are trying to promote your work?

Sneaky and rude if you ask me.
 
  • Like
  • Sad
Likes russ_watters, Bystander, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
Borek said:
So you have come here pretending you ask questions, while in fact you are trying to promote your work?
Sneaky and rude if you ask me.
No.Since I got tired of reading other's articles in these threads,I think it is legitimate.
 
Sneaky and rude, +1.

The paper is in a predatory or near-predatory journal, and it shows a complete ignorance of thermodynamics. It asks us to consider two otherwise identical containers of water at the same temperature and different entropy. Obviously nonsense.
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
  • #10
Vanadium 50 said:
The paper is in a predatory or near-predatory journal, and it shows a complete ignorance of thermodynamics. It asks us to consider two otherwise identical containers of water at the same temperature and different entropy. Obviously nonsense.
This is a peer reviewed journal member of DOAJ.Also,my perspective is accepted by Prof.Martin Chaplin.I can provide the link,if you permitt.
 
  • #11
This may not be the thread to ask in, but:

I had never heard of the 'Mpemba effect' until this morning. I was aware of claims that hot water froze faster than cold water. As someone who has put significant effort into cooling beer as quickly as possible, I can say for certain:
Some places in a refrigerator (or freezer) are subject to much higher air speeds than others. This is true (mostly) while the compressor is running (evap fan), and the precise situation depends on the construction of the freezer, the distribution of things in the freezer, the defrost cycle, insulation... When the circ fan is not running, insulation performance and (other) thermal mass dominate the situation.

Why is the 'Mpemba effect' not obviously an artifact of the (incorrect) asssumption that 2 spots in a freezer are subjected to the same cooling?
 
  • #12
binis said:
This is a peer reviewed journal

Really? And none of the peers noticed that it begins with a thermodynamic impossibility?
 
  • #13
First of all: per forum rules, we don't discuss original research.

Thread locked.
 
  • Like
Likes jim mcnamara and Bystander
Back
Top