The Music of Space: Could Space Dust Transmit Sound?

AI Thread Summary
Space dust cannot effectively transmit sound because it lacks the necessary density and continuity to support coherent wave propagation. Sound requires a medium where particles can collide and transmit vibrations, which space dust fails to provide in a vacuum. When sound is generated, any dust present would scatter and disrupt the original sound wave, preventing it from traveling further. Thus, while sound can travel through various media, the conditions in space do not allow for sound transmission as we understand it. Ultimately, space dust is not a viable medium for sound propagation.
blade_chong
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
if space contains space dust, wouldn't the space dust be a medium for sound to travel?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sound is vibrations traveling through air as pressure differences. Think of it as a high and low pressure wave following each other rapidly.

Since space dust would not be able to have high pressure and low pressure, it couldn't be a medium for sound as we know it to travel.

Imagine a lot of dust on a speaker in space, the very first out push of the speaker drum would send all of the dust off of it, making it impossible to send out any more dust. Also the dust that began traveling would scatter as it hit dust in its path, making complete chaos of the original pulse that started.
 
Sound can actually transmit through any medium, not just air.

I think a more direct explanation is that, in order for sound to travel through the medium, the medium must be dense enough for the particles to transmit a signal, let alone a coherent one.

The dust particles in a vacuum simply don't bang into each other in any fashion that supports any kind of propogated wave.
 
It's not that the medium needs to be dense enough. It must be continuous.
 
FredGarvin said:
It's not that the medium needs to be dense enough. It must be continuous.
For practical purposes, that's the same thing.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?

Similar threads

Back
Top