The Mystery of Photons Inside Electrons: Where Do They Come From?

AI Thread Summary
Photons are not contained within electrons; rather, they are generated by changes in the electromagnetic field caused by the acceleration of charged particles. When electrons lose energy, they emit photons, which represent discrete packets of energy exchanged during interactions with electromagnetic fields. The concept of creating or destroying photons is often meaningless in realistic physical systems, as their presence cannot be quantified in conventional terms. Instead, photons are seen as energy exchanges that occur at specific times and locations during interactions. Ultimately, photons are manifestations of energy transfer rather than entities residing within particles like electrons.
rickyyeungyeung
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
we know that when a electron lost its energy , it will emit photon , but why electron have a photon inside ? does it already exit in a electron from the beginning or it comes from environment ? if comes from environment , where does photon come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, photons are not inside of electrons. They are created by changes in the electromagnetic field, which in turn are generated by the acceleration of charged particles (like electrons and protons) along with changes in their states when bound together (as in atoms and molecules).
 
Drakkith said:
No, photons are not inside of electrons. They are created by changes in the electromagnetic field, which in turn are generated by the acceleration of charged particles (like electrons and protons) along with changes in their states when bound together (as in atoms and molecules).

so which kind of substance produce them?
 
rickyyeungyeung said:
so which kind of substance produce them?
Nothing creates them - in fact, for most realistic physical systems there's not even a meaningful notion of how many photons are present, so talking about creating and destroying them makes little sense.

When an electromagnetic field interacts with matter there's an exchange of energy and momentum between the two; it turns out that this exchange always transfers discrete amounts of energy and momentum at a single time and place. When this happens we say, depending on the direction of transfer, that "a photon was absorbed" or "a photon was emitted" at that time and place.
 
  • Like
Likes davenn and Drakkith
Nugatory said:
Nothing creates them - in fact, for most realistic physical systems there's not even a meaningful notion of how many photons are present, so talking about creating and destroying them makes little sense.

When an electromagnetic field interacts with matter there's an exchange of energy and momentum between the two; it turns out that this exchange always transfers discrete amounts of energy and momentum at a single time and place. When this happens we say, depending on the direction of transfer, that "a photon was absorbed" or "a photon was emitted" at that time and place.
thanks so much for the reply, so what you mean photon
Nugatory said:
Nothing creates them - in fact, for most realistic physical systems there's not even a meaningful notion of how many photons are present, so talking about creating and destroying them makes little sense.

When an electromagnetic field interacts with matter there's an exchange of energy and momentum between the two; it turns out that this exchange always transfers discrete amounts of energy and momentum at a single time and place. When this happens we say, depending on the direction of transfer, that "a photon was absorbed" or "a photon was emitted" at that time and place.
thx so much for the reply, what u mean photon is just a kind of energy exchanged within atoms and electricmagnetic field, so what i can day photons either located in electricmagnetic field or atoms ,is that correct?
 
No, but the photon is "made" from some of the electron's energy.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top