The Mystery of Space-Time Slow Zones

AI Thread Summary
Recent discussions highlight the relationship between mass concentration and time dilation in space-time, suggesting that areas with significant mass, like the centers of galaxies, could experience different rates of time. A study posits that the evolution of life requires long periods of stability, leading to speculation about the existence of alien cultures existing at varying temporal rates. Gravitational time dilation is acknowledged as a minor effect, with significant dilation only occurring near massive objects like black holes. The conversation also clarifies that time perception varies for observers in different gravitational fields, but individuals in those fields experience time normally. Overall, the complexities of space-time and the potential for unobservable alien civilizations remain intriguing topics of debate.
graemecr
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
ok, sorry if i sound daft, but this one has been keeping me awake and i need a better physics brain to tell me why this is b'locks

So, there was a recent study in aus that said Aliens don't exist, or rather that we can't find any evidence, because the conditions for life to evolve require, essentially, long periods of stability in which the evolving organisms regulate the atmosphere to be conducive to further evolution, and the odds of this are really long. i don't think that's the case.however. this got me thinking.

Space and time are both sides of the same coin right. the curvature of space time is dependent on the mass of the objects in the firmament. is that right? the greater the density of matter in a particular area then the greater the time dilation?

so areas that have more mass, like the central zones of galaxies, would have more curvature, both specifically on planets in that area and also generally in the whole zone, hence time would, for any being living there, be experienced at a different rate, more mass more speed or less mass less speed? is that right?

perhaps because we exist in a particular 'zone' or 'band' or area of space time density what we are able to perceive is limited by that density, i.e. we can't perceive the faster or slower zones and they can't perceive us. consider a fly, it experiences time so fast that as we try to swat it it can easily dodge cos we are lumbering super slow giants to them. perhaps alien cultures are happening, either so fast or so slow relative to ourselves that we simply can't experience them. bonkers? possibly. what do you think?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi graemecr,
:welcome:

Gravitational time dilation is a tiny effect. There's really not much more to say here.
To get a dilation factor equivalent to something like two times slower passage of time than somewhere far away from any mass concentrations, you'd need to get very close to an event horizon of a black hole. Anywhere else and you're looking at best at something in the vein of a few hours, maybe days of difference per year of elapsed time.
 
interesting thank you.

So, how close? Because at the centre of the Milky way there is a supergiant one and in the region around that there are literally billions of stars in close proximity - could they be affected. Also, just to be sure, you're saying that the mass that causes dilation would need to be very localised and concentrated and that having equal mass over a larger area - say the inner belt of stars around that black hole would not cause an effect?
 
graemecr said:
interesting thank you.

So, how close? Because at the centre of the Milky way there is a supergiant one and in the region around that there are literally billions of stars in close proximity - could they be affected. Also, just to be sure, you're saying that the mass that causes dilation would need to be very localised and concentrated and that having equal mass over a larger area - say the inner belt of stars around that black hole would not cause an effect?

The super massive BH at the center of our galaxy is ~4.3 million times more massive than our Sun. This gives it a event horizon radius of 1.27e7 km. For an object orbiting it to show a time dilation factor of 1/2 as mentioned earlier, it would have to orbit at a distance of 2.54e7 km. To give you an idea of how close that is, Mercury orbits the sun at a distance of 5.79e8 km or better than 20 times further away. A clock orbiting the BH at the same distance as Mercury orbits the Sun would only show a dilation factor of 0.9834 ( run slow by ~1 min per hr.)
 
Perhaps you are also mixing up perception of the passage of time with a comparison of the passage of time. Just because time appears to pass extremely slow while waiting in front of a microwave oven in comparison, it really doesn't. Same with the fly and the human. However, someone living on a planet as close to a black hole as described above (if they could actually survive living in such an environment) still perceives time as happening one second at a time just like you perceive it now. However, an independent observer would notice your time as running at half the speed of the poor stretched out alien's living too close to a BH. Hope I have this right everyone?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
3K
Back
Top