The Number Devil: A Mathematical Adventure

  • Thread starter Thread starter Weissritter
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematical

How much have you interacted with the book?

  • I've heard of it.

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • I've seen it in [please explain where].

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • I've read it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I've read it and suggested someone to read it.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • I haven't heard about that book in my life

    Votes: 9 81.8%

  • Total voters
    11
Weissritter
Messages
37
Reaction score
0
HE'S A DEMON!
Yep, a Demon, a Teufel if you like. Have you read this book there ↑ ?
Plain statiscal question for statistical answers.
Anything not covered in the poll shall be posted here. Go wild.

41CkMhOnClL._SL500_SS500_.jpg
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I've seen it because you showed me it before =D.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top