The Number e .... Sohrab Proposition 2.3.15 ....

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
Concerns a particular inequality in demonstrating the e = lim ( 1 + 1/n)^n ...
I am reading Houshang H. Sohrab's book: "Basic Real Analysis" (Second Edition).

I am focused on Chapter 2: Sequences and Series of Real Numbers ... ...

I need help with an aspect of the proof of Proposition 2.3.15 ...

Proposition 2.3.15 and its proof read as follows:
Sohrab - Proposition 2.3.15 ... .png

In the above proof by Sohrab, we read the following:

" ... ... It follows that ##t_n \leq s_n## so that

##\text{ lim sup } ( t_n ) \leq e## ... ... "
Can someone please explain exactly how/why ##t_n \leq s_n \Longrightarrow \text{ lim sup } ( t_n ) \leq e## ... ... ?



Help will be appreciated ... ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Recall that if we have ##t_n \leq s_n## for all ##n## (sufficiently large), then ##\limsup_n t_n \leq \limsup_n s_n##.

But, we know that ##\limsup_n s_n = \lim_n s_n = e##, hence the result.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Yes ... can now see that ...

Thanks ...

Peter
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213 and member 587159