The number of ways to express a specific summation

eehsun
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have been thinking about a particular mathematical question (that I've made up) and I haven't been able to reach a solution yet..

I want to find the rule for the function F(x,y) which gives the number of different "ways" that the integer x can be expressed as the summation of "y" pieces of integers (these integers have to be bigger than or equal to 1) (sorry for my awful technical English :))

Let me clarify it with an example:

When we consider F(9,4), it can be observed that

9 = 1+1+1+6
9 = 1+1+2+5
9 = 1+1+3+4
9 = 1+2+2+4
9 = 1+2+3+3
9 = 2+2+2+3

Following from here, since there are 6 different ways of expressing this summation,
F(9,4)=6

In the above example, (1+1+1+6) and, for example, (1+6+1+1) are considered to be the same and thus are counted only once.


NOTE: When we consider (1+1+1+6) and (1+6+1+1) to be different ways of summation, for instance, the problem becomes very easy and can be solved by pigeon hole principle. But the tricky part for me is to find a formula which considers the two expressions above and such to amount to the same.


Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The term you are looking for is "partition". So there's a starting point for you.
 
Thank you very much adriank !
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top