The period of water oscillating in a U-tube

AI Thread Summary
The professor explains that when calculating the period of water oscillating in a U-tube, the effective "length" of the water column should be greater than the average of the lengths around the inside and outside. This adjustment accounts for the differing speeds of water, as the outer water moves faster than the inner water. Since kinetic energy is proportional to the square of the speed, simply averaging the lengths will not accurately reflect the total kinetic energy of the system. Understanding this concept is crucial for accurate predictions of oscillation periods. The discussion emphasizes the importance of considering the volume and kinetic energy relationships in fluid dynamics.
TheLil'Turkey
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
In the following lecture (starting at 21:00), the professor says that when predicting the period of water oscillating in a U-shaped tube, that the "length" of the water column that you should use should be greater than the average of the length around the outside and around the inside. Can someone explain this? Thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The length is used to calculate the volume of the water, and the volume is used to calculate the kinetic energy of the water if it's moving with a speed v.

The water on the outside will be moving faster than the water on the inside, and because the kinetic energy depends on the square of the speed, the sum won't add up to the kinetic energy of the water in the middle.
 
willem2 said:
The length is used to calculate the volume of the water, and the volume is used to calculate the kinetic energy of the water if it's moving with a speed v.

The water on the outside will be moving faster than the water on the inside, and because the kinetic energy depends on the square of the speed, the sum won't add up to the kinetic energy of the water in the middle.
Great explanation. Thanks.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top