Why Does Snow Pack Better Near the Melting Point?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Charles Link
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the optimal conditions for packing snow to build snowmen, emphasizing that snow packs best when temperatures are above freezing. The unique properties of water, particularly its expansion upon freezing, influence how snow behaves under pressure. When temperatures are close to the melting point, applying slight pressure can cause the snow to melt slightly, allowing it to re-solidify and hold together better. Participants share personal experiences of building snowmen, noting that wetter snow, typically found near freezing temperatures, is ideal for packing, while dry snow is less effective regardless of temperature. The conversation also touches on the challenges of making snowmen in colder conditions, where snow is less sticky, and the fun memories associated with snow activities. Additionally, there is a mention of various snow types and their moisture content, with insights from snow scientists on the best conditions for snowball making and snowman construction.
Charles Link
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
Messages
5,919
Reaction score
3,113
Over the last 20 years or more, I have made the observation that the snow for making a snowman only packs properly when the temperature is, in general, above freezing. This could be explained by the unique property of water, which, because it expands upon freezing, the solid phase will melt when pressure is applied. To get the snow to pack well, the temperature of the snow needs to be close enough to the melting point that a slight pressure will melt it, and then it re-solidifies in its new form as the pressure is released. Last Saturday, Chicago had a snowfall that occurred with above freezing temperatures, and I was able to build this snowman in my backyard. He started out at about 5'0", and now stands about 4'0", after a couple of days of partial melting along with sublimation has reduced his height. Anyway, I think I got the physics part correct, but it was fun making the snowman in any case. :) ## \\ ## Editing: @Chestermiller I welcome your feedback. Do I have the thermodynamics correct on this one, in regard to the snow packing much better near the melting point? :) ## \\ ## Additional editing: The explanation of the physics of getting snow to pack in this post is later determined to be most likely incorrect, with a different explanation offered by @DrClaude in post 20.

DSCF6597.JPG
 

Attachments

  • DSCF6597.JPG
    DSCF6597.JPG
    42.8 KB · Views: 2,623
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes nuuskur, sysprog, phinds and 8 others
Physics news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
Nice snowman. What did you name him?
I didn't give him a name yet, but I think I will call him "Archimedes". :) The weather forecast for Chicago is calling for below freezing temperatures for another week or so, so he should be around for a while. :)
 
Yes and maybe he’ll shout Eureka as he takes a bath in the melt water. :-)
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes sysprog, phinds, ProfuselyQuarky and 2 others
In case anyone is unfamiliar with how a good snowman is made, especially those in warmer climates, you begin by making a small snowball, perhaps about 6"-8" diameter with your hands. You then take that ball and roll it in the snow, turning it every so often to keep it spherical. If the snow packs well, the ball will increase quickly in size, and it actually gets easier once the snowball gets larger, and the weight of it creates its own pressure to the snow below it that it picks up. (When it is smaller, it helps to press downward to help pick up the snow). A good size for the bottom is about 24"-30" inches in diameter. You first make the bottom, and then do the same with the middle, and then lift the middle onto the bottom portion. The head is the easiest because it doesn't need to be very large. ## \\ ## And to repeat the observation mentioned in post 1, if the snow is cold, i.e. even a degree or two below the freezing point, it will be very difficult to get it to pack in order to make a good snowman. ## \\ ## Additional comment: On this one, the snow was only packing moderately well, and it took me perhaps 1/2 hour or more to make it. On a previous one in December, that I made that was slightly larger, the snow was packing exceptionally well, and I built it in about 15 minutes.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu and Greg Bernhardt
When I was young I made snow angels then snow men then a snow fort for snow ball battles. We had a lot of fun with our sleds and saucers with the saucers doubling as shields in a snow battle. The fastest downhill thing though was a freezer door. It was so fast and the snow got sprayed in your face as it spun around.
 
  • Like
Likes Hamiltonian and Charles Link
I have never ever touched fluffy snow. I have been at very high altitudes with cable-cars and trains, but only in the summer, where the snow was basically ice at those heights.

I can't relate to all these wonderful things. Always lived in nice temperate countries (I am well accustomed to heat).
 
lekh2003 said:
I have never ever touched fluffy snow. I have been at very high altitudes with cable-cars and trains, but only in the summer, where the snow was basically ice at those heights.

I can't relate to all these wonderful things. Always lived in nice temperate countries (I am well accustomed to heat).
An Australian acquaintance of mine once told me that it does snow in some part of Australia, especially those around the center of the continent. You never have winter vacation there?
 
blue_leaf77 said:
An Australian acquaintance of mine once told me that it does snow in some part of Australia, especially those around the center of the continent. You never have winter vacation there?
I have lived, for a large portion of my life, in the Middle East. I have since moved to Australia. It does not snow at all, mostly hail. Of course, we can go up to Blue Mountains or Snowy Mountains, for vacations, but I never had the opportunity.

But I'm 14, I have plenty of time left to go on vacations to all kinds of places.
 
  • #10
lekh2003 said:
I have lived, for a large portion of my life, in the Middle East. I have since moved to Australia. It does not snow at all, mostly hail. Of course, we can go up to Blue Mountains or Snowy Mountains, for vacations, but I never had the opportunity.

But I'm 14, I have plenty of time left to go on vacations to all kinds of places.

No worries. I grew up in Texas, worked in Louisiana for about a decade, and now reside in Arizona, all places that see very little snow on average. I think I remember building a snowman one year when I was a kid, and that single snowman used up all of the snow in our yard.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link and blue_leaf77
  • #11
DSCF6598.JPG
Chicago still has cold weather, so the snowman isn't melting yet. Here is a picture of the snowman "Archimedes" on 2-8-18:
 

Attachments

  • DSCF6598.JPG
    DSCF6598.JPG
    37 KB · Views: 1,537
  • Like
Likes collinsmark and DennisN
  • #12
DSCF6599.JPG
Here is another picture of the snowman that I made on 2-3-18 that I took today, Saturday 2-10-18. Even though we (Chicago) had 10" of snow yesterday, (you can see the additional snow in the picture=I brushed the new snow off of the snowman though), it came down with temperatures several degrees below freezing, and it would have been very difficult to make another snowman because it packs very poorly when the temperature is that much below freezing. For the snowman from 2-3-18, there was only about 1" of snow, but the temperature was just right, (just above freezing), so that it was somewhat easy to make. ## \\ ## He started out at nearly 5'0" tall, but he is now about 3'6" tall, because of evaporation and partial melting. Temperatures are forecast to be 39 degrees in Chicago on Wednesday, and most likely he will melt on that day.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF6599.JPG
    DSCF6599.JPG
    32.8 KB · Views: 1,609
Last edited:
  • #13
DSCF6612.JPG
The previous snowman melted on Wednesday 2-14-18, but today, Saturday 2-17-18, we had another 1" of snow in Chicago that packed exceptionally well, since the temperature was around 35 degrees, and I made another snowman. This one is about 5' 8" tall. The forecast is predicting temperatures in the 40's tomorrow, so most likely he will melt. Because the snow packed exceptionally well, this one only took me about 15 minutes to make.
 

Attachments

  • DSCF6612.JPG
    DSCF6612.JPG
    52.5 KB · Views: 1,620
  • Like
Likes DennisN and Greg Bernhardt
  • #14
Drakkith said:
I think I remember building a snowman one year when I was a kid, and that single snowman used up all of the snow in our yard.
Here is a little snowman for you (the snowman was not done by me, I found it and took a photo of it a couple of days ago, when we had a little snow):
40348736131_53b2279c94_c.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 40348736131_53b2279c94_c.jpg
    40348736131_53b2279c94_c.jpg
    111 KB · Views: 1,913
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes ProfuselyQuarky, Charles Link and Drakkith
  • #15
DennisN said:
Here is a little snowman for you (a photo I took a couple of days ago, when we had a little snow):
View attachment 220590
@DennisN The photo didn't show up. Instead it is a .jpg without a working link. ##\\ ## Editing: It showed up as an attachment in your quote that I'm responding to, so I can now see it. Very cute. :) And I also can now see it in post 14. Very cute. :)
 
  • #16
Charles Link said:
@DennisN The photo didn't show up. Instead it is a .jpg without a working link.
Thanks! It works on my computer, could you try hitting refresh (F5 or something) on your computer, perhaps?
 
  • #17
DennisN said:
Thanks! It works on my computer, could you try hitting refresh (F5) on your computer, perhaps?
See my edited post above. I can see it now. Thanks. :)
 
  • #18
DSCF6616.JPG
Here is a photo of me with the latest snowman, taken by my neighbor lady. The snowman is about 5'0" tall in this picture, and was about 5'8" tall yesterday. (Temperatures were in the upper 30's today and it is melting a little). Forecast is for rainy and 50's tomorrow in Chicago, so he's likely to undergo a phase change. :) :)
 

Attachments

  • DSCF6616.JPG
    DSCF6616.JPG
    76.5 KB · Views: 1,432
  • Like
Likes jedishrfu, DennisN and Drakkith
  • #19
You could give him heftier muscles by packing snow on the shovel handles.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #20
Charles Link said:
To get the snow to pack well, the temperature of the snow needs to be close enough to the melting point that a slight pressure will melt it, and then it re-solidifies in its new form as the pressure is released.
I think that this is completely wrong. The ability to make snowballs is related to the wetness of the snow. Dry snow is not sticky at all, whatever the temperature, and I think the amount of pressure needed to even partially melt it is beyond what you can achieve with your hands. When the snow is wet, no pressure is needed: simply taking a snowball and lightly putting it on fresh snow is enough to make additional stick to it.

There is often a link between the wetness of the snow and temperature: wet snow usually falls when temperatures are close to freezing. But I have often seen dry snow when the temperature is just below freezing. Likewise, old snow that has been on the ground all winter is rarely sticky, whatever the temperature.

Caveat: all this is based on personal experience of having lived nearly all my life in regions where snow is abundant. I have never dug deeper as to what actually makes snow wet and dry.
 
  • Like
Likes sbrothy, Dragrath and Charles Link
  • #21
I remember packing snowballs. The snow had to have a certain consistency. Basically it had to be a little wet and as we packed it, it got more ice like and wouldn't fall apart when thrown.

We also used slushy snow to make ice balls by squeezing the water out and forming an icy ball. We didn't do that too often as slushy balls lead to soggy gloves, then icy cold fingers and time for hot chocolate.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link and DrClaude
  • #22
DrClaude said:
I think that this is completely wrong. The ability to make snowballs is related to the wetness of the snow. Dry snow is not sticky at all, whatever the temperature, and I think the amount of pressure needed to even partially melt it is beyond what you can achieve with your hands. When the snow is wet, no pressure is needed: simply taking a snowball and lightly putting it on fresh snow is enough to make additional stick to it.

There is often a link between the wetness of the snow and temperature: wet snow usually falls when temperatures are close to freezing. But I have often seen dry snow when the temperature is just below freezing. Likewise, old snow that has been on the ground all winter is rarely sticky, whatever the temperature.

Caveat: all this is based on personal experience of having lived nearly all my life in regions where snow is abundant. I have never dug deeper as to what actually makes snow wet and dry.
I do think that you @DrClaude may be correct. The polar nature of the water molecule might also be part of the mechanism for packing. ## \\ ##One feature of the temperature observation that I have made is that an air temperature of 32 degrees is sometimes too cold for packing, and one explanation is that the snow is colder than the air. Will wet snow pack when the temperature is colder? Then I think it would be more like an ice and snow mixture with very little water, and it might not be very wet. ## \\ ## The presence of snow,(perhaps different types), along with water and ice complicates any phase diagram that one might try to construct, so I agree, it may be a stretch, and in fact, incorrect to attribute the packing to something going on in the P vs. T diagram. At this time, I think I concur with @DrClaude . ## \\ ## Editing: Something that might further refute my initial explanation for packing in the OP is, would it be possible to make a snowball even if the P vs. T curve for the solid to liquid line for water had a positive slope, (instead of the negative slope that it has)? And I think the answer would be yes.
 
Last edited:
  • #23
jedishrfu said:
We also used slushy snow to make ice balls by squeezing the water out and forming an icy ball. We didn't do that too often as slushy balls lead to soggy gloves, then icy cold fingers and time for hot chocolate.
I remember slushy snow during snowball fights. Snowballs made of slushy snow (non-icy) were a bit like WMDs; semiprohibited, hard to handle by the aggressor, but when fired properly against the target, quite powerful and nasty.
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #24
DennisN said:
I remember slushy snow during snowball fights. Snowballs made of slushy snow (non-icy) were a bit like WMDs; semiprohibited, hard to handle by the aggressor, but when fired properly against the target, quite powerful and nasty.
Essentially turns into ice balls
 
  • Like
Likes Dragrath and Charles Link
  • #25
@DrClaude appears to have a very good explanation for what is responsible for good packing. In any case, I always enjoy it when the snow conditions are right for making a snowman. As a youngster,(age 6 or 7), I saw my uncle roll a couple of large, (2 feet diameter or more), snowballs to make a snowman. As a teenager, I could never repeat the result. It wasn't until I was perhaps in my late twenties or early thirties that I finally made a good sized snowman, and over the next ten or twenty years, I observed there was a very strong correlation of packing quality to air temperature at or above the melting point. :)
 
  • #26
28698574_1874975479242630_720467372986063571_o.jpg
Here is a snowman I made today, Tuesday 3-13-18, in my backyard in Chicago. The temperature (32 degrees) made for good packing, but there was very limited snow, so this time all I could assemble was a small snowman. He stands about 3'0" high. He might be the last snowman of the season for us, because spring usually means warmer weather and little snow. :)
 

Attachments

  • 28698574_1874975479242630_720467372986063571_o.jpg
    28698574_1874975479242630_720467372986063571_o.jpg
    99.1 KB · Views: 872
  • #27
29873160_1913173885422789_5397536105409601792_o.jpg
Today Monday 4-9-18, we had about 1" of snow in Chicago that was at a very good packing temperature (33 degrees), and I did much better than the previous one. This one is nearly 5'6" tall. :)
 

Attachments

  • 29873160_1913173885422789_5397536105409601792_o.jpg
    29873160_1913173885422789_5397536105409601792_o.jpg
    88.5 KB · Views: 765
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt
  • #28
You'll have to take daily measurements to see how fast he shrinks and how its related to the exposed surface area.

Nice creation too!
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #29
My preference has been the ice that forms on trees. Its a very beautiful and serene picture of nature in action especially if it drags the power lines down and you now have nothing to watch on TV.

As a kid, sticky snow was great for snowmen, snow forts and snowball battles while dry snow was great for sledding. On becoming a Dad, I began to hate sticky snow because it made shoveling so much harder and was especially troublesome after the snowplow came by (right after you cleared the driveway to go out :-) and dumped a load of heavy packed snow at the entrance much deeper, dirtier and higher than you can imagine. Ugh!
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #30
30051815_1913656365374541_8061808485857791148_o.jpg
Here is a photo taken about 6 hours later at 4:30 P.M. With the afternoon sun shining on him, he was leaning tremendously to one side, but I propped him up at the base with some snow that I found in the shade. He has now shrunken to about 4'0" tall, but should survive until tomorrow, with nighttime temperatures below freezing. Tomorrow they are forecasting 46 degrees and sunny here in Chicago, so he will most certainly melt tomorrow. :-) :-)
 

Attachments

  • 30051815_1913656365374541_8061808485857791148_o.jpg
    30051815_1913656365374541_8061808485857791148_o.jpg
    81.9 KB · Views: 730
  • #31
Nieve-Penitentes-Argentina-1-1920x706.jpg
Lots of interesting stuff here. There are several factors involved, for a serious discussion you should look at works dealing with the metamorphosis of snow, snow crystal growth and snow crystal thermal gradients.
Most all of this will be found under snowpack analysis books and avalanche prediction. Snow is a crystalline structure. As thermal gradients change the moisture will tend to move from warmer regions to cooler regions. The crystals in the cooler regions will tend to grow as they assimilate the new moisture. Part of formation of a glacier is that the crystals grow to well over a foot in length. When placed under high pressures (do to the depth of bury) these large and quite strong crystals exhibit a plastic quality allowing the ice to flow.
Back to Snowman X you could also look up a snow condition named Nieves Penitentes. This means Penitent snow. It is a condition that happens mostly in the high altitudes of the southern hemisphere. The higher portions of the snow are continually cooled by sublimation as the moisture is carried through the pores of the snow pack. This allows the high points to grow and stay present. However most of the moisture travels down and is metamorphed into ice crystals, This adds great strength but significantly reduces volume as the crystals are far more dense than snow. This leads to large fields of "little penitent snowmen" evolving from large seasonal snowpacks.
 

Attachments

  • Nieve-Penitentes-Argentina-1-1920x706.jpg
    Nieve-Penitentes-Argentina-1-1920x706.jpg
    26.5 KB · Views: 841
  • Like
Likes rsk, Dragrath, BillTre and 1 other person
  • #32
Penitent? Had to look that one up. Sounds like an anthropomorphism.
 
  • #33
30051996_1923029921103852_2501695137404576270_o.jpg
I thought for sure we were all done making snowmen this year in Chicago when I made the snowman a week ago (4-9-18) that was almost 5'6" tall. ## \\ ## Today (Monday 4-16-18) though, we had another inch of snow, and I was able to put together a 4'0" snowman in my backyard. :)
 

Attachments

  • 30051996_1923029921103852_2501695137404576270_o.jpg
    30051996_1923029921103852_2501695137404576270_o.jpg
    106.1 KB · Views: 663
  • #34
Thursday, November 15, (last Thursday), Chicago had 1/2' of snow with temperatures just above freezing that made for good packing. I managed to make a 3'0" snowman in my backyard. See photos:
46414990_2317319485008225_721704649194733568_o.jpg
46292229_2317318771674963_6780125567778816000_o.jpg
 

Attachments

  • 46414990_2317319485008225_721704649194733568_o.jpg
    46414990_2317319485008225_721704649194733568_o.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 747
  • 46292229_2317318771674963_6780125567778816000_o.jpg
    46292229_2317318771674963_6780125567778816000_o.jpg
    93.8 KB · Views: 689
  • Like
Likes rsk, DennisN and jedishrfu
  • #35
Doesn’t he/she need this years clothing style?
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #36
jedishrfu said:
Doesn’t he/she need this years clothing style?
I'm using the same clothing,(scarf, cap, and gloves), and eyes and nose (those are empty medicine bottles with the covers removed), and red duct tape that I have for the last couple of years. I suppose I could try to find something different, but I'm not terribly fashion conscious.:wink:
 
  • #37
47032953_2343743255699181_457948706092613632_o.jpg
47191411_2343742319032608_4202597723582496768_o.jpg
Here are pictures of a snowman I made today, Thursday 11-29-18, in my backyard. I believe this one is the largest snowman I have ever made.
 

Attachments

  • 47032953_2343743255699181_457948706092613632_o.jpg
    47032953_2343743255699181_457948706092613632_o.jpg
    60.2 KB · Views: 688
  • 47191411_2343742319032608_4202597723582496768_o.jpg
    47191411_2343742319032608_4202597723582496768_o.jpg
    70.7 KB · Views: 523
  • #38
47433517_2353153688091471_2954131523265101824_o.jpg
Here is a current picture on Tuesday 12-4-18 of last Thursday's (11-29-18) snowman. Chicago had plenty of rain on Saturday 12-1-18 and Sunday 12-2-18, along with temperatures as high as 47 degrees, so I covered the snowman with plastic during this time, and he survived. We now have cold weather in the forecast in Chicago for at least a week, so he just might be around for a while. He is still 5'0" tall, but has lost some of his bulk.
 

Attachments

  • 47433517_2353153688091471_2954131523265101824_o.jpg
    47433517_2353153688091471_2954131523265101824_o.jpg
    75.9 KB · Views: 541
  • Like
Likes Greg Bernhardt and jedishrfu
  • #40
I made one large snowman in February this year that lasted about 3 weeks, whose pictures I did not post, but here is a picture of today's snowman Sunday 4-14-19, which will likely be the last one of the year. This one is about 4'0" tall.
57052372_2627154260691411_7330323273672032256_o.jpg
 
  • #41
Note: The above picture is from my backyard in Chicago, Illinois. Let me repeat it here, because we are on a new page. The snowman is 4'0" tall from Sunday 4-14-19.
57052372_2627154260691411_7330323273672032256_o.jpg
 
  • #42
58594726_2657310891009081_8379065665000046592_o.jpg
I was expecting the snowman of 4-14-19 to be the last one of the season in Chicago, but today 4-27-19, I built another (see photo) that also is 4'0" tall. We usually do not get snow in Chicago in late April. It is even somewhat uncommon in mid-April.
 
  • Like
Likes DrClaude, Drakkith and Greg Bernhardt
  • #43
73295362_3160072327399599_8087416417571307520_o.jpg
In a very early snow in Chicago on 10-31-19, we got enough snow to make a 4'0" snowman. Happy Halloween.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Dragrath, DrClaude and Drakkith
  • #44
Charles Link said:
View attachment 252145In a very early snow in Chicago on 10-31-19, we got enough snow to make a 4'0" snowman. Happy Halloween.
Archimedes got new gloves this season ☃
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #45
newbiegirl said:
Archimedes got new gloves this season ☃
You are very observant. I couldn't find the old pair, (I found them a half hour later), so I put a different (more colorful) pair of gloves on the snowman. ☃☃
 
  • #46
Good snow for a snowball fight is also probably good snow for a snowman or snowwomen.

"Light, powdery snow does not contain a lot of moisture or air, making it difficult to pack into a snowball. For the best snowballs, seek out snow from areas where the ground may be warmer. Wetter snow makes for better snowballs. "

From, https://www.google.com/search?q=wha.....69i57j33.13079j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

"Snow comes in five categories: dry (zero percent water), moist (less than 3 percent), wet (3 to 8 percent), very wet (8 to 15 percent) and slush (more than 15 percent). By that scale, moist to wet snow is ideal for snowman building, according to Jordy Hendrikx, a snow scientist at Montana State University. "

From, https://www.google.com/search?q=wha...ome..69i57.22991j1j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
 
  • Like
Likes Charles Link
  • #47
Spinnor said:
Good snow for a snowball fight is also probably good snow for a snowman or snowwomen.

"Light, powdery snow does not contain a lot of moisture or air, making it difficult to pack into a snowball. For the best snowballs, seek out snow from areas where the ground may be warmer. Wetter snow makes for better snowballs. "

From, https://www.google.com/search?q=wha.....69i57j33.13079j0j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

"Snow comes in five categories: dry (zero percent water), moist (less than 3 percent), wet (3 to 8 percent), very wet (8 to 15 percent) and slush (more than 15 percent). By that scale, moist to wet snow is ideal for snowman building, according to Jordy Hendrikx, a snow scientist at Montana State University. "

From, https://www.google.com/search?q=wha...ome..69i57.22991j1j8&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8
The less than 3 percent (moist) IMO most likely is difficult to get it to pack. I have found that the snow packs much better when the temperature is above freezing, as opposed to a couple of degrees below. I don't have instrumentation to put a precise number on this, but from looking at the above numbers, I probably like the 8-15% (very wet) category for ease in rolling the balls for a snowman.
 
  • #49
Just one additional comment: In one of the articles that came up in the above links, one of the "experts" said that a ratio of about 5:1 snow to water seems to work the best for snowmen. That would be a very wet snow of about 16%, which I would be in agreement with. The other expert who said a "moist to wet" snow works best was perhaps using the terminology loosely, and was not relating this to the 3% to 8% category.
 
  • #50
Charles Link said:
Just one additional comment: In one of the articles that came up in the above links, one of the "experts" said that a ratio of about 5:1 snow to water seems to work the best for snowmen. That would be a very wet snow of about 16%, which I would be in agreement with. The other expert who said a "moist to wet" snow works best was perhaps using the terminology loosely, and was not relating this to the 3% to 8% category.

Clearly more research is needed, a research topic that might win you an Ig Nobel prize if it has not already been won by someone?
 
  • Like
Likes Dragrath and Charles Link
Back
Top