Questioning the Propagator: Diagonal or Not?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sumeetkd
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Propagator
sumeetkd
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
This might turn out to be a stupid question but ...i couldn't understand

The propagater is defined as exp[-iHt/(h/2pi)]...this would be the matrix
so U(t)|\psi(x,0)> (matrix . vector) would give |\psi(x,t)>

What i couldn't understand is that the propagator is a diagonal matrix..but it is obvious that
probability of a particle at x,t will be affected by the entire wave distribution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
First of all, why do you say that the propagator is a diagonal matrix? In general, in "real" space it is not (while in momentum space, it is, as momentum states have a well-defined energy hence are eigenstates of the Hamiltonian).
Secondly, note that x is just some label here, the dynamics is in the time variable.
Finally, if you consider a string with a wave propagating in it, you will see that it is perfectly possible to describe the motion of each point on the string without referring to other points on it, for example u(t) = cos(t/f - kx), for fixed x.
 
I am a total beginner so there are some leaps in my logic.

In real basis the propagator turns out to be sigma over n of (h^2/2m) d^2n/dx^2n for the diagonal terms rest terms being zero. hence the doubt.

The thing about the string was ok for the classical case, but in the quantum case
the probability at x at a later time would be integral( <x|U|x'><x'|psi(x,0)>).
That is there is a contribution from each point in space to the probability distribution that would exist at (x,t).

Hence i felt there should be off diagonal terms.

The problem is also that if you take it in the p basis and then take x components you get non zero terms but in the real basis i was not able to understand how the off diagonal terms are non zero.

Thanks for your help compuchip. please let me know, even if i have made some real sad mistake in calculations
 
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...

Similar threads

Back
Top