The purpose of that rubbery stuff inside the skull

  • Thread starter Thread starter Janitor
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the practice of wearing phylacteries, boxes containing scriptures worn on the forehead by Jewish individuals, symbolizing the importance of having the scriptures in mind. This prompts a historical inquiry into when the understanding of the brain as the center of thought emerged. The conversation explores the evolution of beliefs about the brain's function, noting that ancient cultures may have attributed mental processes to the heart, with some even believing the brain's role was to cool the blood. The mention of Galen around 200 A.D. marks a significant point in recognizing the brain as the source of motor control, while Aristotle's contributions are highlighted as the origin of misconceptions about brain function. The discussion raises questions about the development of these ideas and the evidence found in ancient texts.
Janitor
Science Advisor
Messages
1,107
Reaction score
1
I was listening to Christian talk radio this morning. The speaker said that Jewish people--or maybe it was exclusively males--sometimes wore "phylacteries." These were boxes with scriptures placed in them, and they were worn, presumably with the help of a strap, on the forehead. The speaker explained that doing this was their way of showing that they had the scriptures "in the front of their minds.”

That got me to wondering how long ago this practice started. It must have been after a general consensus was formed that that chunk of cauliflower inside the skull was the organ that did our thinking for us. When did that idea become accepted? Hundreds of years ago? Thousands?

I would think that there must have been times when a tribesman was wounded in the head by a fall from a tree or a wallop from an enemy club, such that brain damage was done. The others may have noticed that ever after, Ug talked funny and couldn’t walk in a straight line. Would that have been enough to start an oral tradition that the gelatinous gray stuff in the head was where our motor controls were located? Are there any ancient books that mention such a thing?

I no longer remember where, but I once read that there was a time when it was thought by some that the brain’s main function was to cool the blood. The heart, on the other hand, noticeably sped up under stressful conditions, leading folks to think that it was where the mind was located. Has anybody heard this?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Thanks for the links, gerben. Around 200 A.D. at least one person (Galen) figured the brain was the source of motor control. And it was Aristotle who started the false ideas of my last paragraph.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
78
Views
12K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Back
Top