The rigid rotator and Angular momentum.

siddharth5129
Messages
94
Reaction score
3
If spherical harmonics are simultaneous eigenfunctions of \hat{L} and \hat{L}_{z}, then that means for a state at which l=1, and where you have three possible values of m (1, 0 , -1) that the value of L and L_{z} cannot really be determined simultaneously. Because the three fold degeneracy of the state implies that the rigid rotator exists in a three dimensional subspace with the eigenkets given by the three spherical harmonics determined by l=1. Is this true, or am I getting something wrong? My textbook says that they can be determined simultaneously, but I'm pretty sure this is only true if the particle exists in a state given by one of the eigen-kets of the degenerate subspace.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
siddharth5129 said:
If spherical harmonics are simultaneous eigenfunctions of \hat{L} and \hat{L}_{z}, then that means for a state at which l=1, and where you have three possible values of m (1, 0 , -1) that the value of L and L_{z} cannot really be determined simultaneously. Because the three fold degeneracy of the state implies that the rigid rotator exists in a three dimensional subspace with the eigenkets given by the three spherical harmonics determined by l=1.
I've having a hard time understanding your argument here. But the rotation of a rigid rotor is described by \hat{L}^2, and since \hat{L}^2 and \hat{L}_z commute, it is always possible to measure both ##l## and ##m##. That said, if the system is in a superposition of different ##m## states, with the same value of ##l##, then of course upon measurement only a single value of ##m## will be obtained and the rotor will "collapse" to that particular ##l,m## state, which does not affect the possibility of measuring ##l## independently.
 
yeah. that makes sense. I was confusing myself. Thanks.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top