The Science Behind Light: Electrons, Antennas, and EM Radiation Explained

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Vosh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Source
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of light and electromagnetic (EM) radiation, specifically examining the mechanisms behind their emission, including the roles of electrons in antennas and atomic transitions. Participants explore concepts related to thermal emission, discrete spectra, and the differences between various types of light sources.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that light and EM radiation originate from electrons being energized to higher orbits and then falling back, emitting photons.
  • Others argue that antennas transmit radio waves by vibrating electrons, which create oscillating electric fields that propagate through space, suggesting a different mechanism of light emission.
  • A later reply questions whether the first type of emission is what is referred to as "thermal emission," which results in a continuum spectrum, while the second type, due to atomic transitions, results in line spectra.
  • One participant notes that most light encountered in daily life is due to the vibrations of electrons in antennas, while the emission from atomic transitions is less common and produces a precise color or frequency of light.
  • Another participant asserts that all light can be attributed to redistributions of electric charges.
  • There is a suggestion that thermal emission does not involve electrons falling to lower orbits, contrasting with the discrete spectra produced by atomic transitions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the mechanisms of light emission, with no consensus reached on the relationship between thermal emission and atomic transitions. Multiple competing perspectives remain regarding the nature of light sources and their characteristics.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of the topic, with some expressing uncertainty about the definitions and implications of the different types of light emission. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on terms like thermal emission and atomic transitions.

Vosh
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
I read that the source of all light/EM radiation is an electron being energized to a higher orbit, then falling back and shedding a photon. But, I also read that an antenna transmits radio by dint of the e's in the antenna being vibrated back and forth so that the electric field lines emanating from them wiggle, like shaking a rope at one end and making waves travel down the rope, and these waves, with the help of their magnetic fields, propagate through space. Is that also an instance of e's rising and then falling? Many thanks.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Vosh said:
I read that the source of all light/EM radiation is an electron being energized to a higher orbit, then falling back and shedding a photon. But, I also read that an antenna transmits radio by dint of the e's in the antenna being vibrated back and forth so that the electric field lines emanating from them wiggle, like shaking a rope at one end and making waves travel down the rope, and these waves, with the help of their magnetic fields, propagate through space. Is that also an instance of e's rising and then falling? Many thanks.
It's a pretty primitive description but at least metaphorically accurate (the electrons don't actually rise and fall). The two descriptions (excitation/emission and electromagnetic waves) are two ways of looking at the same phenomenon.
 
No, these two kinds of light emission are very different.

Almost all the light that we normally encounter comes from "e's in the antenna being vibrated back and forth so that the electric field lines emanating from them wiggle."

The other kind of light emission, due to rising and falling electron energy levels, is seen more rarely. Examples are lasers, neon lights, and in nature we see these emissions from stars and galaxies. The main thing about these kinds of emissions is that the color or frequency of the light is very precise, corresponding to the size of the fall in the energy level of the electron.
 
Crosson said:
No, these two kinds of light emission are very different.

Almost all the light that we normally encounter comes from "e's in the antenna being vibrated back and forth so that the electric field lines emanating from them wiggle."

The other kind of light emission, due to rising and falling electron energy levels, is seen more rarely. Examples are lasers, neon lights, and in nature we see these emissions from stars and galaxies. The main thing about these kinds of emissions is that the color or frequency of the light is very precise, corresponding to the size of the fall in the energy level of the electron.

Well, this tips my Universe upside down. Firstly, I don't have formal training under my belt. I'm, shall we say, PBS Nova educated. That said, I'm not sure what you mean; do you mean that most of the EM radiation we encounter - as in radio waves impacting us, etc.? And the visible light is caused by the e's falling back to a lower orbit? Many thanks for your patience.
 
You could say that all light is due to redistributions of electric charges.
 
Crosson said:
No, these two kinds of light emission are very different.

Almost all the light that we normally encounter comes from "e's in the antenna being vibrated back and forth so that the electric field lines emanating from them wiggle."

The other kind of light emission, due to rising and falling electron energy levels, is seen more rarely. Examples are lasers, neon lights, and in nature we see these emissions from stars and galaxies. The main thing about these kinds of emissions is that the color or frequency of the light is very precise, corresponding to the size of the fall in the energy level of the electron.

Question: Is the former what is referred to as "thermal emission", resulting in a continuum spectrum?

The latter of course, the emission due to atomic transitions, results in line spectra.
 
Question: Is the former what is referred to as "thermal emission", resulting in a continuum spectrum?

The latter of course, the emission due to atomic transitions, results in line spectra.

Yes, exactly.

Vosh said:
Well, this tips my Universe upside down. Firstly, I don't have formal training under my belt. I'm, shall we say, PBS Nova educated. That said, I'm not sure what you mean; do you mean that most of the EM radiation we encounter - as in radio waves impacting us, etc.? And the visible light is caused by the e's falling back to a lower orbit? Many thanks for your patience.

No, I mean that most instances of EM radiation, including visible and radio parts of the spectrum, are the result of thermal emission, and they don't have anything to do with electrons falling into a lower orbit.

When electrons change their energy level in an atom they produce a discrete spectrum as see here:

http://www.physics.uc.edu/~sitko/Co...omicPhysics/AtomicPhysics_files/image006.jpg"
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K